Total views : 56

Comparison Between Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) Model and Artificial Neural Network(ANN) Model for the Lean Practices of Manufacturing Industries (SMEs) of Gujarat


  • C. U. Shah University, Surendranagar - Ahmedabad Highway, Nr. Kothariya Village, Dist. Surendranagar, Wadhwan – 363030, Gujarat, India


Lean Manufacturing practices are basically waste reduction perspective, in which value adding activities are focused over non value adding activities, however there are other advantages like process improvement, muda elimination, muri elimination but its main principal is work improvement through process flow and pull kanban.which finally results in increased productivity and key performance factor improvement like quality, cost, financial impact. Performance measures can only be controlled, if the critical factors are identified and explored among various process parameters. The objective of the paper is to compare the ANN base SPSS model with conceptual model and its linear regression model for lean manufacturing for SMEs. The comparison will gives the closeness of the data obtained for Model development and theory development .The residual indices were measured and equated to predict the performance measures. The operational level factors were explored for different performance measures of lean practices and their synaptic weightage for ANN was determined by activating hidden layer method in SPSS 20.


Artificial Intelligence, Neural Networks, Productivity, SMEs (Small and Medium scale Manufacturing Enterprises), Waste

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 62)


  • Azoff EM. Neural network time series forecasting of financial market. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA; 1994.
  • Bishop CM. Neural networks for pattern recognition.Oxford University press, New York, USA; 1995. p. 1–477.
  • Maliki OS. Comparison of regression model and artificial neural network model for the prediction of electrical power generated in Nigeria. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2011; 2(5):329–39.
  • Zhao Y, Chua DKH. Relationship between productivity and non value-adding activities. Lean Construction, DK, Japan; 2010. p. 1–11.
  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black W. Multivariate data analysis. 5th edition Pearson Education press. 1998. p.768.
  • Massie DD, Curtiss PS. Neural Network fundamentals for scientist and engineers. In the Proceedings of the international conference of efficiency, Costs, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Aspects of Energy systems and Processes (BCOS), Istanbul, Turkey; 2001. p. 123–8.
  • Mendenhall, Beaver. Introduction to probability and statistics.Ninth Edition, International Thomson Publishing; 1994.
  • Neural Ware. Welcome to NeuralWare ! [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017]. Available from: Crossref.
  • Olowo B. NEPA meets the challenge. African Review, UK; 2002 Apr. p. 42.
  • Regression: A Comparison Report. Finance India. 2007; xxi(3):923–30.
  • Sharda R, Patil R. Neural networks as forecasting experts: an empirical test. In the Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington DC, USA. 1990; I:491–4.
  • Swales GS, Yoon Y. Applying Artificial Neural Networks to Investment Analysis. Financial Analysts Journal. 1992; 48(5):78–80. Crossref.
  • IBM Analytics. What is IBM SPSS? [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2008]. Available from: Crossref.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.