Total views : 242

Students’ Learning Style among Planning Students in Nigeria using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory

Affiliations

  • Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, 81310, Malaysia

Abstract


Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate students’ learning style preferences among planning students in Nigeria. This is to probe whether the students meet the objectives of the department in achieving overall university philosophy. Methods/ Statistical Analysis: Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (KLSI) as effective tool in understanding students’ learning styles was used to assess students’ learning style. Questionnaire administered among 110, 72 and 84 students of planning department in 200, 300 and 500 levels respectively totalled 266 students. Questionnaire was designed through a discrete scoring system, recognised and grouped students into four discrete groups related with different disciplines of knowledge. The descriptive statistics and correlation were employed for the analysis. Findings: The study tried to validate the university general admission procedure and departmental curriculum. Applications/Improvements: Suggestions were made to improve university admission procedure for planning students.

Keywords

Kolb, Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, Learning Style, Nigeria, Planning Students.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 185)

References


  • Aljaberi NM. University students’ learning styles and their ability to solve mathematical problems. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2015; 64(1):152-65.
  • Meehan-Andrews TA. Teaching mode efficiency and learning preferences of first year nursing students. Nurse education today. 2009; 29(1):24-32.
  • Khan TH, Khan MAAS, Ahmad ASB. Students’ learning style in architecture: A case study in Malaysia. International Conference on Science, Technology & Social Sciences; 2012.
  • Dandy K, Bendersky K. Student and Faculty Beliefs About Learning in Higher Education: Implications for Teaching.International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education.2014; 26(3):358-90 .
  • Kadir MBBA. The relationship between students’ learning style and academic performance in Mara professional college, Malaysia. The Asian Conference on Education; Osaka, Japan. 2013. p.1-17.
  • Udeani U, Adeyemo SA. The relationship among teachers’ problem solving abilities, student’s learning styles and students’ achievement in biology. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology. 2011; 2(1):82-7.
  • Tawil NM, Ismail NA, Asshaari I, Othman H, Zaharim A, Bahaludin H. Preference learning style in engineering mathematics: Students perception of E-learning. International Education Studies. 2013; 6(6).
  • Kolb D. Experiential Learning: Experience as a source of learning and development’.Prentice Hall: New Jersey; 1984.
  • Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development: Pearson Education: New York; 2014.
  • Zhang J, Evans MS. An empirical study on the multidimensional learning styles of Chinese EFL students. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research.2013; 68:61-5.
  • Kopsovich RD. A study of correlations between learning styles of students and their mathematics scores on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills Test; 2001.
  • Alkhasawneh IM, Mrayyan MT, Docherty C, Alashram S, Yousef HY. Problem-based Learning (PBL): Assessing students’ learning preferences using VARK. Nurse education today. 2008, 28(5):572-9.
  • Hall M. The effect of cooperative learning groups and competitive strategies on math facts fluency of boys and girls.The Effects of Learning Strategies. 2008. p. 1-28.
  • Lively M. D. A. Kolb’s theory of experiential learning: Implications for the development of music theory instructional material. [Problem in Lieu of Thesis Prepared for the Degree of Master of Music]. Texas: University of North Texas; 2001.
  • Felder RM. Matters of style. ASEE prism. 1996; 6(4):18-23.
  • Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R. Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest. 2008; 9(3):105-19.
  • Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research: Interaction Book Company; 1989.
  • Kolb AY. The Kolb learning style inventory-version 3.1 2005 technical specifications. Hay Resource Direct: Boston, MA. 2005. p. 200.
  • Kolb A, Kolb D. Experiential learning theory, a dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. Department of organizational behavior. Case Western Reserve University. Western Reserve University Working Paper; 2008.
  • Joy S, Kolb DA. Are there cultural differences in learning style? International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2009; 33(1):69-85.
  • Fleming S, McKee G, Huntley-Moore S. Undergraduate nursing students’ learning styles: A longitudinal study.Nurse education today. 2011; 31(5):444-9.
  • Kolb AY, Kolb DA. The learning way meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simulation & Gaming. 2009; 40(3):297-327.
  • Chen YC. Linking learning styles and learning on mobile Facebook. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2015; 16(2):94-114.
  • Katsioloudis P, Fantz TD. A comparative analysis of preferred learning and teaching styles for engineering, industrial, and technology education students and faculty. Journal of Technology Education. 2012; 23(2):61-9.
  • Sadowski MS, Birchman JA, Harris LVA. An assessment of graphics faculty and student learning styles. Engineering Design Graphics Journal. 2009; 70(2):1-8.
  • Daniels W. Nurse as Educator: Principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice. ABNF Journal. 2009; 20(1):129.
  • Mayer RE. Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer.International Journal of Educational Research. 1999; 31(7):611-23.
  • Mayer RE. Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational psychologist. 1997; 32(1):1-19.
  • Sabeh G, Bahous R, Bacha NN, Nabhani M. A match or a mismatch between student and teacher learning style preferences.International Journal of English Linguistics. 2011; 1(1):162-72.
  • Akinyode BF. Effect of LAUTECH on Housing Demand in Ogbomoso, Oyo state: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.2013. p. 88.
  • Lautech. Overview of LAUTECH: Historical Background: LAUTECH Press: Available from: http://www.lautech.edu.ng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article& id=50&Itemid=27; 2016.
  • Lautech. University Handbook, Lautech. LAUTECH Press, Nigeria; 2007.
  • Lautech. Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria; 2003.
  • Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.1970; 30:607-10.
  • Israel GD. Determining Sample Size. A series of the agricultural education and communication department, UF/ IFAS Extension. Department of Agricultural Education and Communication; 2013.
  • Israel GD. Determining Sample Size. In: Florida Uo, editor.Program evaluation and organizational development, Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida; 1992.
  • Creswell JW. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th (edn). International edition ed: PEARSON Publications; 2012.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.