Total views : 356

A Framework for Mobile Learning Adoption


  • Electrical Engineering Department, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman 11941, Jordan


Objective: This paper discusses the concept of mobile learning (m-learning), its benefits, critical factors driving m-learning adoption, challenges of adoption and future of m-learning. Methods: This research proposes a framework for a longitudinal study on Jordanian universities combined with interviews based on a comprehensive approach of reviewing literature in m-learning. Findings: The research recommends that m-learning is a promising field that will revolutionize the learning process all over the globe however many issues are yet to be investigated. Originality: This research is one of the few studies to apply longitudinal approach to explore the use of m-learning in universities of a developing country.


Education, E-learning, M-learning, T-learning, Web learning.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 221)


  • UNESCO policy guidelines for mobile learning, 2013[Online]. Available from: 0021/002196/219641e.pdf
  • Chandhok S, Babbar P. M-learning in distance education libraries: A case scenario of Indira Gandhi National Open University. The Electronic Library. 2011; 29:637–50.
  • Lehner F, Nosekebel H. The role of mobile devices in e-learning first experiences with a wireless e-learning environment.IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education; 2002 Aug.
  • Donnelly K. Learning on the move: How m-learning could transform training and development. Development and Learning in Organizations. 2009; 23:8–11.
  • Suki N. Mobile phone usage for m-learning: Comparing heavy and light mobile phone users. Campus-Wide Information Systems. 2007; 24:355–65.
  • Mobile Learning at Work. 2013. Available from:
  • Little B. Effective and efficient mobile learning: Issues and tips for developers. Industrial and Commercial Training.2012; 44:402–7
  • Little B. Issues in mobile learning technology. Human Resource Management and International Digest. 2013; 21:26– 9.
  • World Bank, Maximizing Mobile. Information and Communications for Development; 2012.
  • Kroski E. On the move with the mobile web: Libraries and mobile technologies. Library Technology Reports. 2008; 44:5–53.
  • Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly.1989; 13:319–40.
  • Kakihara M, Sorensen C. Expanding the ‘mobility’ concept.ACM SIGGROUP Bull. 2001; 22:33–7.
  • Lin YR, Huang JH, Chuang ST. Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. The Electronic Library. 2007; 25:586–99.
  • Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing. 1988; 52:2–22.
  • Cheong JH, Park MC. Mobile internet acceptance in Korea.Internet Research. 2005; 15: 125–40.
  • Newnham RE, Lee S, Smith NB. Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. Achievement and Achievement Motivation.Spence, J.T, editor. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman; 1989. p. 75–146.
  • Atkinson JW. An Introduction to Motivation. 1st ed. 1964.
  • Wu MC, Wang YS, Wang HY. Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology.2009; 40:92–118.
  • Chiu CM, Wang ETG. Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information and Management. 2008; 45:194–201.
  • Bergin DA, Cole JS, Whittaker TA. Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value.Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2008; 33:609–24.
  • Liu Y, Han Sh. Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus-wide Information Systems. 2010; 27:210–26.
  • Maniar N, Bennett E. Media influence on m-learning? Proc.of VideoFunet Conference; Tampe. 2007 May.
  • Kukulska-Hulme A. Mobile usability in educational contexts: What have we learnt? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2007; 8:1–16.
  • Ali S. Challenges and Benefits of Implementing Tablets in Classroom for e-Learning in a K-12 Education Environment – Case Study of a School in United Arab Emirates.International Journal of Engineering and Science. 2012; 3:39–42.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.