Total views : 660

A Case Study on Motivation and Constraints of Corporate Product Philanthropy

Affiliations

  • Division of Social Welfare, Baekseok University, Cheonan, Korea, Republic of

Abstract


Due to the limited public resources in comparison to the growing need for social welfare, it has increasingly been concerned to develop resources in the private sector. However, it has been less discussed about product donations comparing with cash giving. Product donations, popularly known as gifts-in kind, are a form of non-cash philanthropic contributions. Recently, product giving have increasingly become both a form of corporate philanthropy and a source for nonprofit organizations. This study is to explore perceptions on motivation and constraints of corporate product philanthropy for more effective management of product donations. Data were collected by interview in-depth with four corporate managers and two NPOs staff in charge for product donation in South Korea. As the result, three categories were identified as motivation of corporate product donation: ‘charitable and altruistic cause’, ‘effective use of excess inventory’ and ‘strategic corporate philanthropy’. Also, the staff of corporations and NPOs perceived three categories as constraints on product philanthropy: ‘tax benefits less than disposal and liquidation’, ‘ambiguity of the calculating of value of donated products’, ‘lack of intermediary service and recognition’ and ‘weak partnership among government, corporations and NPOs’. Based on the findings of study, suggestions are discussed for policy implications and effective intermediary systems such as the on-line catalog of Good 360.

Keywords

Case Study, Corporate Philanthropy, Motivation of Philanthropy, Product Donation

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 361)

References


  • Park KT. A comparative study of the policy to bring forward donor aid among nations [Master Dissertation]. Department of Public Administration, Jungang University Graduate School; 2012.
  • Ross JM, McGiverin-Bohan KL. The business case for product philanthropy. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University; 2012.
  • AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy, Giving USA 2011, AAFRC Trust, Indianapolis, IN; 2011.
  • Community ChestKorea. Annual Report; 2009.
  • The Beautiful Foundation. Forum on Tax System Improvement for Activating Donation; 2009.
  • Son WL, Lee ST, Park SK. A Policy Recommendation for proliferation of charitable contribution. Korea Institute of Public Finance; 2010.
  • Kwark DS. The impact of social service Workers’ fairness perceptions about corporate donation on their pro-corporate voluntary behaviors: focused on corporates’ in-kind contribution to food banks [PhD thesis]. Department of Social Welfare, Sungshil University Graducate School;2012.
  • Illingworth PML, Pogge TW, Wenar L. Giving Well: The Ethics of Philanthropy. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
  • Freedman E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
  • Drucker P. The New Pluraisms, New York: Harper and Row; 1989.
  • Dienhart JW. Charitable investment: A strategy for improving the business environment. Journal of Business Ethics.1988; 7(1):63–71.
  • Jeong JO. A study on activation of the donation culture: Improvement of relevant systems [Master thesis]. Graduate School of Public Administration, Yonsei University; 2010.
  • Guid Star Korea. A study on international case of product donation and intermediary organizations; 2005.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.