Total views : 353

A Link between Consumer Empathy and Brand Attachment on Branded Mobile Apps: The Moderating Effect of Ideal Self-Congruence

Affiliations

  • Department of Psychology, Kangwon National University, Korea, Republic of

Abstract


Background/Objectives: The present study examined a hypothesized model of branded mobile apps that considers the impact of consumer empathy on brand attachment and the moderating effect of ideal self-congruence. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Based on data collected from 395 Korean undergraduate students who have used branded apps, testing of the hypothesized model was conducted by structural equation modeling using AMOS 21. The current study controlled for CMV by including all items loaded on their theoretical constructs a single source as a first-order factor in the structural models. Findings: The results showed a strong moderating effect of self-congruence on the relationship between consumer empathy and brand attachment in the context of branded applications. Therefore, consumers who experience empathy with their branded mobile apps are likely to emotionally attach to a brand when they perceive a high level of ideal self-congruence with the brand. Application/Improvements: Based on these findings, brand managers can take advantage of mobile application channels for the purposes of branding and relational marketing strategies.

Keywords

Brand Attachment, Branded Mobile Apps, Consumer Empathy, Ideal Self-Congruence.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 345)

References


  • eMarketer. Mobile ad spending in Western Europe will top $12 billion this year. 2015a Mar. Available from: http://www.emarketer.com/corporate/coverage#results/1283. Data accessed: 01/09/2015.
  • Marketing Chart. Media consumption estimates. 2013 Aug. Available from: https://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-consumption-estimates-mobile-pc-digital-tv-35626. Data accessed: 01/09/2015.
  • eMarketer. Nearly nine in 10 in South Korea are on a mobile device. 2015b Feb. Available from http://www.emarketer.com/corporate/coverage#/results/1276. Data accessed: 01/09/2015.
  • Buck C, Horbel C, Kessler T, Germelmann CC. Mobile consumer apps: Big data brother is watching you. Marketing Review St. Gallen. 2014 Feb; 31(1):26–35.
  • Sultan F, Rohm A. The coming era of “brand in the hand” marketing. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2005; 47(1):83–90.
  • Morgan-Thomas A, Veloutsou C. Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience. Journal of Business Research. 2013 Jan; 66 (1):21–7.
  • Rondeau DB. For mobile applications, branding is experience. Communications of the ACM. 2005 Jul; 48(7):61–6.
  • Escalas JE, Stern BB. Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising dramas. Journal of Consumer Research. 2003 Mar; 29(4):566–78.
  • Wieseke J, Geigenmüller A, Kraus F. On the role of empathy in customer-employee interactions. Journal of Service Research. 2012 Jul; 15(3):316–31.
  • Peng KF, Chen Y, Wen KW. Brand relationship, consumption values and branded app adoption. Industrial Management and Data Systems. 2014 Aug; 114(8):1131–43.
  • Aron A, Fisher H, Mashek DJ, Strong G, Li H, Brown LL. Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Reurophysiology. 2005 Jul; 94(1):327–37.
  • Kem ZZK, Benyoucef M, Zhao SJ. Consumer participation and gender differences on companies’ microblogs: A brand attachment process perspective. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015 Mar; 44:357–68.
  • Read W, Robertson N, McQuilken L. A novel romance: The technology acceptance model with emotional attachment. Australasian Marketing Journal. 2011 Nov; 19(4):223–9.
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 1989 Aug; 35(8):982–1003.
  • Rao S, Troshani I. A conceptual framework and propositions for the acceptance of mobile services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2007 Aug; 2 (2):61–73.
  • Bellman S, Potter RF, Treleaven-Hassard S, Robinson JA, Varan D. The effectiveness of branded mobile phone apps. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2011 Nov; 25(4):191–200.
  • Rohm AJ, Gao TT, Sultan F, Pagani M. Brand in the hand: A cross-market investigation of consumer acceptance of mobile marketing. Business Horizons. 2012 Sep-Oct; 55 (5):485–93.
  • Parreno MJ, Sanz-Blas S, Ruiz-Mafe C, Aldas-Manzano J. Key factors of teenagers’ mobile advertising acceptance. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2013 May; 113(5):732–49.
  • Djamasbi S, Strong DM, Dishaw M. Affect and acceptance: Examining the effects of positive mood on the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems. 2010 Jan; 48(2):383–94.
  • Yang B, Kim Y, Yoo C. The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations. Journal of Business Research. 2013 Sep; 66(9):1345–52.
  • McCoy S, Galletta DF, King WR. Applying TAM across cultures: The need for caution. European Journal of Information Systems. 2007 Feb; 16(1):81–90.
  • Tsang MM, Ho SC, Liang TP. Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2004; 8(3):65–78.
  • Sirdeshmukh D, Singh J, Sabol B. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing. 2002 Jan; 66(1):15–37.
  • Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing. 1988 Jul; 52(3):2–22.
  • Monroe KB. Pricing-making profitable decisions. McGraw Hill: New York, 1990; 1–1.
  • Kim HW, Chan HC, Gupta S. Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems. 2007 Feb; 43(1):111–26.
  • Lam SY, Shankar V. Asymmetries in the effects of drivers of brand loyalty between early and late adopters and across technology generations. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2014 Feb; 28 (1):26–42.
  • Wang RJH, Malthouse EC, Krishnamurthi L. On the go: How mobile shopping affects customer purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing. 2015 Jun; 91(2):217–34.
  • Dunn L, Hoegg J. The impact of fear on emotional brand attachment. Journal of Consumer Research. 2014 Jun; 41(1):152–68.
  • Schmitt B. The consumer psychology of customer-brand relationships: Extending the AA Relationship model. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2013 Apr; 23(2):249–52.
  • Taute HA, Sierra J. Brand tribalism: An anthropological perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 2014 Mar; 23(1):2–15.
  • Wallace E, Buil I, De Chernatony L. Facebook ‘friendship’ and brand advocacy. Journal of Brand Management. 2012 Dec; 20(2):128–46.
  • Cova B, Cova V. Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing. European Journal of Marketing. 2002 Jun; 36 (5/6):595–620.
  • Eisenberg N, Strayer J. Critical issues in the study of empathy. In: Empathy and its Development. Cambridge Studies in Social and Emotional Development,Cambridge University Press: New York. 1987; 3–13.
  • Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 1980; 10(1):82–5.
  • Feshbach ND. Studies of empathic behavior in children. Progress in Experimental Personality Research. 1978; 8(1):1–47.
  • Thomson M, MacInnis DJ, Park CW. The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachment to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2005 Jan; 15(1):77–91.
  • Park CW, MacInnis DJ, Priester J, Eisingerich AB, Iacobucci D. Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing. 2010 Nov; 74(6):1–17.
  • Shankar V, Balasubramanian S. Mobile marketing: A synthesis and prognosis. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2009 May; 23(2):118–29.
  • Reimann M, Castano R, Zaichkowsky J, Bechara A. How we relate to brands: Psychological and neurophysiological insights into consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2012 Jan; 22(1):128–42.
  • Higgins ET. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review. 1987 Jul; 94(3):319–40.
  • Kressmann F, Sirgy MJ, Herrmann A, Huber F., Huber S, Lee DJ. Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research. 2006 Sep; 59(9):955–64.
  • Malar L, Krohmer H, Hoyer WD, Nyffenegger B. Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing. 2011 Jul; 75(4):35–52.
  • Chandon P, Wansink B, Laurent G. A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing. 2000 Oct; 64 (4):65–81.
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003 Oct; 88(5):879–903.
  • Ashley C, Tuten T. Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology and Marketing. 2015 Jan; 32 (1):15–27.
  • Hirschman EC, Holbrook MB. Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing. 1982 Summer, 46 (3):92–101.
  • Huber F, Vollhardt K, Matthes I, Vogel J. Brand misconduct: Consequences on consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Business Research. 2010 Nov; 63 (11):1113–20.
  • Jurisic B, Azevedo A. Building customer–brand relationships in the mobile communications market: The role of brand tribalism and brand reputation. Journal of Brand Management. 2011 Jan; 18 (4-5):349–66.
  • Dasgupta A, Chandra B. Indian consumers of handicrafts shaped by globalizaion: A profiling based on materialism, consumer ethnocentrism, and world-mindedness. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016 Jan; 9(1):1–14.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.