• P-ISSN 0974-6846 E-ISSN 0974-5645

Indian Journal of Science and Technology


Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Year: 2024, Volume: 17, Issue: 23, Pages: 2381-2389

Original Article

A Cross-Sectional Study to Analyse Patients’ Decision-Making Variables for Prosthodontic Treatment

Received Date:15 February 2024, Accepted Date:17 May 2024, Published Date:03 June 2024


Objectives: The patient's attitude, appropriate treatment planning, and decision-making are necessary to fabricate dental prostheses. This study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing patients' decision-making, patient expectations, and approval of the suggested treatment strategy regarding prosthodontic treatment by the population in the Faridabad region. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out amongst 143 patients in the Department of Prosthodontics at Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, over one month to determine patient's attitudes toward treatment for dental prosthesis. The self-administered questionnaire was made in both English and Hindi languages. The questionnaire's Part A section included demographic data about patients enrolled in the epidemiological survey. Part B of the survey assessed their attitude toward the absence of teeth. Part C comprised close-ended multiple-choice questions assessing the factors affecting decision-making. Part D assessed the patient's expectations from the prosthodontic treatment. Part E evaluated whether the suggested course of treatment was accepted and the reason why the suggested treatment course was rejected. Statistical Analysis: Logistic regression analysis and cross-tabulation analysis were performed using the SPSS 23.0 program to assess the relation between the decision to choose dental prosthesis treatment and independent variables using Tukey's test. Findings: In this analysis, the p-values for age, marital status, gender, level of education, and socio-economic status, when associated with the acceptance of the treatment plan, were all above 0.05, suggesting no statistically significant correlation in these specific associations. However, the elderly population (>60 years) showed a higher percentage of acceptance. Also, female patients readily accepted the suggested treatment plan. Most patients demonstrated acceptance of the proposed course of treatment, with financial considerations emerging as a primary deterrent for those who declined. However, patients were hesitant to get treatment done if surgery was required. Novelty: This epidemiological survey highlighted the importance of the development of health policies regarding dental treatment to make it more affordable for all socioeconomic groups. Conclusion: The importance that patients have on appearance and the crucial role that dentists play in creating treatment plans. As a result, it draws attention to crucial areas that require improvement and intervention.

Keywords: Decision making, Prosthodontics, Treatment protocol, Patient education, Patient acceptance of healthcare


  1. Goldstein RE, Patzer G. Concepts of Dental Esthetics. In: Ronald E. Goldstein's Esthetics in Dentistry (3). (pp. 1-22) Wiley. 2018.
  2. Brandt S, Lauer HC, Güth JF, Bühling S, Sayahpour B, Romanos G, et al. Impact of two different patient decision aids in prosthodontic consultations: a prospective randomized controlled study. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2023;27(12):7841–7849. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05375-7
  3. Leelavathi L, Rani SL. Awareness and Attitude Towards Missing Tooth Replacement Among Partially Edentulous Outpatients - A Hospital Based Study. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020;12(1):2466–2474. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.01.380
  4. Murdoch AIK, Blum J, Chen J, Baziotis-Kalfas D, Dao A, Bai K, et al. Determinants of Clinical Decision Making under Uncertainty in Dentistry: A Scoping Review. Diagnostics. 2023;13(6):1–18. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061076
  5. Ellakany P, Fouda SM, Alghamdi M, Aly NM. Factors Affecting Clinical Decision-Making Among Dentists and Dental Students: A Crosssectional Study. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2022;35(5):581–587. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7359
  6. Tomaselli G, Buttigieg SC, Rosano A, Cassar M, Grima G. Person-Centered Care From a Relational Ethics Perspective for the Delivery of High Quality and Safe Healthcare: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2020;8:1–11. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044
  7. Schell J, Cavanaugh K, Gutman T. Shared Decision-making. In: Evidence-Based Nephrology (2). (pp. 473-487) John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. 2022.
  8. Shukla S, Awasthi A, Singh S, Arora M, Jain S. Awareness and Attitude of Geriatric Patients Regarding Implant Prosthodontic Options. Journal of Advanced Sciences. 2023;2(1):22–27. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.58935/joas.v2i1.25
  9. Alhaddad AJ, Munshi N, Ali WM, Aldoiej AA, Ali A, Alnemari FH, et al. Factors affecting patients' behaviors toward prosthodontic treatment needs in Saudi Arabia. Medical Science. 2021;25(118):3345–3355. Available from: https://www.discoveryjournals.org/medicalscience/current_issue/v25/n118/A31.htm
  10. Nedumgottil BM. A study to scrutinize the aspects concerning patient decision-making and dental prosthesis selection. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences. 2022;14(Suppl 1):S518. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_96_22
  11. Parlani S, Tripathi S, Bhoyar A. A cross-sectional study to explore the reasons to visit a quack for prosthodontic solutions. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2018;18(3):231–238. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_24_18
  12. Nayana P, Dhakshaini MR, Raghavendra SK, Sowmya S, Ravi MB. An Evaluation of Factors Affecting Patient's Decision Making Regarding Dental Prosthetic Treatment. Journal of Evolved Medicine and Dental Science. 2009;8(49):3683–3687. Available from: https://www.jemds.com/data_pdf/nayan%20pual-dec-9-.pdf
  13. Benecke M, Kasper J, Heesen C, Schäfer N, Reissmann DR. Patient autonomy in dentistry: demonstrating the role for shared decision making. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2020;20:1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01317-5
  14. Alfouzan AF, Labban N, Al-Otaibi HN, Taweel SMA, Alshehri HA, Alradan M, et al. Public Perception and Motivation for Prosthodontic Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Medical Dentistry. 2022;26(2):291–302. Available from: https://ijmd.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/017-Afnan-F.-Alfouzan-291-302.pdf
  15. Hall MA, Karawia I, Mahmoud AZ, Mohamed OS. Knowledge, awareness, and perception of digital dentistry among Egyptian dentists: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):1–9. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03698-1
  16. Sana A, Saleem T, Aziz A, Abbas M. Why do Patients Refuse Pre-Prosthetic Procedures? A Qualitative Study in a Private Sector Dental Teaching Institute. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 2022;72(3):1032–1036. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72i3.7777


© 2024 Kalra et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee)


Subscribe now for latest articles and news.