Learning a foreign language has become a common experience for many people now a days. The main reason is globalization and ease of mobility that urged the need to learn foreign languages in different contexts. However, learners of foreign languages or a foreign language experience different levels of anxiety in their attempt to learn foreign
However, the focus of the present study is on Chinese language learning anxiety experienced by international students in China. In this regard, figures from the last ten years show that international students coming to China are significantly increasing. These students take Chinese language courses or a course, however, the anxiety level that these students experience while studying Chinese language was not exhaustively investigated so far. One study that can be mentioned in this regard is the study conducted by
Foreign language learning anxiety is undesirable communication apprehension and unpleasant emotional condition that affects the language learning performance of students. Studies confirmed that students with high levels of anxiety receive lower scores than students with lower anxiety levels
Accordingly, there are tremendous studies conducted on foreign language learning anxiety in different countries across the globe, but in order to get a better understanding of language learning anxiety, it appears important to further explore why different learners become anxious when learning different foreign languages. In the past most of the foreign language anxiety studies were conducted on English as a foreign language because of its popularity throughout the world
The study started with the following two hypotheses:
There is significant difference in Chinese language learning anxiety scores between international students according to their continent, gender and study program.
The background variables (number of Chinese friends one has, the number of months one has lived in China, number of semester Chinese language course(s) attended in China and number of months spent on studying Chinese language in home country) has significant relationship with Chinese language learning anxiety score of international students.
Anxiety, as applied to foreign language learning, has been defined by several researchers who have tried to study the issue.
Anxiety experienced in Foreign or second language learning context can take two forms: facilitating and debilitating anxiety. This in turn can influence students’ learning either positively or negatively. Facilitative anxiety is helpful in alerting the learner for hard work while debilitative anxiety is associated with negative feelings like frustration, nervousness, uneasiness, apprehension and tension, and limits the learner from learning the language effectively
To maintain effective foreign/second language learning, understanding the possible cause of the underlying anxiety is important. A review of the literature on foreign language anxiety indicates that the causes of foreign language learning anxiety include learners’ self-perceived incompetence and classroom-related variables (teacher, peer, classroom practice)
This study employed quantitative research design to examine the Chinese language learning anxiety of international students coming from African and Asian countries. Doing this helped the study to objectively measure the Chinese language learning anxiety of the learners’ and to reach an objective conclusion.
The target population of the study included all active MA and PhD international students at Northeast Normal University in the spring semester of the 2019 academic year. Taking one semester Chinese language course is mandatory for both MA and PhD program students. Therefore, these students have taken at least one Chinese language course, and they experienced anxiety of studying Chinese as a foreign language. A simple random sample technique was used to select the participants of the study.
This study used both open ended and close ended questionnaire items. The total questionnaire items were 31. The first nine items were about the background information of the participants, and the rest 22 Likert scale items were the Foreign Language Anxiety Scale (FLAS) adapted from the works of
As the research design was quantitative, the analysis of the data was done quantitatively using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21. Then it was summarized using descriptive statistics namely mean, frequency distribution and percentage. The study also employed independent sample t-test to see if African and Asian international students experience significantly different Chinese language learning anxiety. The independent sample t-test used also helped the study to see if gender difference affected the Chinese language learning anxiety level. The study also used correlation test to see the relationship between the participants’ background traits and Chinese language learning anxiety.
This section presents the data analysis and interpretation. The study used independent sample t-test to determine the significance of the difference in Chinese language learning anxiety of international students. The study considered continent, gender and study program (MA and PhD) as variables to see differences in Chinese language learning anxiety. Furthermore, the study used correlation test to determine the association between Chinese language learning anxiety and number of Chinese friends one has, the number of months one has lived in China, number of semester Chinese language course attended in China and number of months spent on studying Chinese language in home country as variables (See table 1 for details).
Participants variables |
Frequency |
Percent |
African |
40 |
50 |
Asian |
40 |
50 |
Male |
51 |
63.75 |
Female |
29 |
36.25 |
MA students |
56 |
70 |
PhD students |
24 |
30 |
Total |
80 |
100 |
To measure the level of Chinese language learning anxiety, a questionnaire having 31 items was used. The first 9 items were background information questions and the rest 22 were foreign language anxiety scale (FLAS) items. Since these 22 questionnaire items are 5 scale items, the total anxiety score ranged from 22 to 110. The difference between these values is 88. Accordingly, the participants with anxiety score of 74 and above are considered as having high anxiety. Those who score in the range of 52-73 are taken as experiencing moderate anxiety while the others with anxiety scores below 51 are categorized as having low anxiety experiences (Table 2 has more).
Response |
Frequency |
Percent |
Participants with high anxiety level >=74 |
3 |
3.75 |
Participants with moderate anxiety level [52-73] |
60 |
75 |
Participants with low anxiety score level < 51 |
17 |
21.25 |
Total |
80 |
100 |
The majority (75%) of the respondents exhibited moderate Chinese language learning anxiety. The overall mean for the anxiety score (M=59.83; SD =11.94, N=80) of the participants also falls within the moderate anxiety level range. This moderate anxiety level of students indicates that there is little anxiety provoking practices in Chinese language classes.
An independent sample t-test was ran to determine if there were differences in Chinese language learning anxiety between international students coming from Asia and Africa. The mean of the anxiety score for each group were normally distributed and equal variance was assumed. A total of 40 international students from Africa and 40 international students from Asia were considered for the independent sample t- test. The African (N=40, M=2.82, SD=.555) and the Asian (N=40, M=2.67, SD=.520) groups were compared for the Chinese language learning anxiety score. The independent sample t-test, t (78) = 1.179, p<.05), indicated that there is no statistically significant difference in Chinese language learning anxiety score between the Asian and African international students at 95% confidence interval. As a result the study failed to reject the null hypothesis that claims there is no significant Chinese language learning anxiety between African and Asian international students.
Independent samples t-test was ran to compare the Chinese language learning anxiety score of men and women international students. The anxiety score of the women (N= 29, M=2.662, SD=.5393) and men (N=51, M=2.792, SD= .5085) revealed a slightly different mean score. However, the independent sample t-test result, t (78) =1.040, p<.05, proved that the Chinese language learning anxiety score between men and women is statistically not significant at 95% confidence interval of the difference. Hence, the study failed to reject the null hypothesis; and it can be argued that gender difference does not cause difference in anxiety score of Chinese language learning. Both men and women can learn Chinese language without experiencing significantly different anxiety because of the gender difference.
The study compared MA international students (N=56, M=2.84, SD= .5416) and PhD international students (N= 24, M=2.53, SD= .4841) for differences in Chinese language learning anxiety score. Assuming equal variance, the independent t- test at t (77)= 2.35, p<.05 for the mean difference in anxiety score revealed that there is statistically significant difference in Chinese language learning anxiety between MA and PhD international students. That means the MA international students are more anxious in learning Chinese language than PhD international students are. Hence, the study rejected the null hypothesis that claims there is no significant difference in Chinese language learning anxiety between MA and PhD program students. The PhD program students’ age (32 years) on average makes them older than the MA students (29.5 years) in this study. Therefore, it can be argued that having longer life experience helps with coping anxious situations. In addition, compared with the MA program the PhD program takes longer to complete successfully. Hence, PhD students have a better chance at repeating the course if failed. This might be the reason why the PhD students are less anxious. Detail of the independent t-test is given in
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances |
t-test for Equality of Means |
|||||||||
F |
Sig. |
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Mean Difference |
Std. Error Difference |
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
|||
Lower |
Upper |
|||||||||
Anxiety mean |
Equal variances assumed |
.559 |
.457 |
2.350 |
77 |
.021 |
.30603 |
.13023 |
.04672 |
.56535 |
Equal variances not assumed |
2.464 |
45.617 |
.018 |
.30603 |
.12420 |
.05597 |
.55610 |
This study used correlation to see the relationship between international students’ background traits (number of Chinese friends one has, the number of months one has lived in China, number of semester Chinese language course attended in China and number of months spent on studying Chinese language in home country). See
Group traits |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Number of Chinese friends one has |
78 |
11.4103 |
16.45571 |
Number of Months one has lived in China |
80 |
19.8500 |
13.23029 |
Number of semester Chinese language course attended in China |
80 |
2.3250 |
3.25606 |
Number of months spent on studying Chinese language in home country |
80 |
1.4750 |
3.62821 |
The correlation test started with correlating the participants’ Chinese language learning anxiety score with the number of Chinese friends the participants have; however, the test revealed a weak negative Pearson correlation (r =-.198, N= 80, p= 0.83) This implies that there is no statistically significant correlation. Similarly, the study investigated the correlation between international students’ Chinese language learning anxiety score and the length of time one has lived in China. The correlation test shows very weak negative correlation (r=-.142, N= 80, p= 0.209). So, it can be concluded that there is no significant correlation between the variables. The result of the Pearson bivariate correlation analysis also shows that participants’ Chinese language learning anxiety score and the time spent on studying Chinese language in China and back in their home country had no statistically significant correlation. Therefore, the study failed to reject the null hypothesis that states there is no significant relationship between the participants’ background variables (number of Chinese friends one has, the number of months one has lived in China, number of semester Chinese language course attended in China and number of months spent on studying Chinese language in home country) and their Chinese language learning anxiety scores.
It was found that African and Asian international students at Northeast Normal University do not have statistically significant different anxiety experience in their Chinese language classes. The independent sample t-test proved that the difference in the mean anxiety score of the two groups is statistically insignificant. Hence, it can be concluded that African and Asian international students experience Chinese language classes in the same manner regardless of the geographical and cultural proximity they have with China. Yet,
However, in the comparison between MA and PhD students’ Chinese language learning anxiety score, the independent sample t-test proved that there is statistically significant difference between the groups. The MA students were found more anxious as compared to PhD program students. The PhD students in this study are on average older than the MA students, and the result indicate that the PhD (the older) students are less anxious in their Chinese language study. However, previous studies by
On the other hand, the correlation test shows that there is no significant association between the participants’ traits (number of Chinese friends one has, the number of months one has lived in China, number of semester Chinese language course attended in China and number of months spent on studying Chinese language in home country) and Chinese language learning anxiety score. This implies that the length of time one lives in China, without the individuals effort to learn the target language, does not guarantee learning the language. However, this finding contrast with
Although it is true that having the target language exposure is helpful in foreign language learning, this study proved that the number of friends one might have from the target language speakers (number of Chinese friends in this case) has no association with one’s Chinese language learning anxiety. The individuals’ effort to use the opportunity for improving his/her Chinese language matters.
This research was carried out to investigate Chinese language learning anxiety of international students. The results revealed that most of the international students had moderate anxiety experience in learning Chinese as a foreign language. No significant difference among African and Asian international students in their Chinese language learning anxiety experiences was reported. Similarly female and male students have no significantly different anxiety. Similarly, no significant differences were found between the levels of anxiety among participants due their gender differences. However, significant differences were found between the levels of anxiety among students owing to their level of study (PhD and MA). But this finding cannot be enough evidence to conclude that two groups need different treatment in Chinese language classes. On the other hand, the correlation test ran to determine the relationship between participants’ background traits (number of Chinese friends one has, the number of months one has lived in China, number of semester Chinese language course attended in China and number of months spent on studying Chinese language in home country) and Chinese language learning anxiety shows no significant correlation. That means none of the correlation tests revealed significant correlation. It is thus, concluded that the number of Chinese friends one has and the length of time spent on taking Chinese language course both in home country and China have neither positive nor negative association with the learners’ anxiety experience.
The conflicting results of studies on the Chinese as foreign language learning anxiety as indicated in the discussion section, however, suggested the need for further large scale studies on international students studying in China to examine the variables that account to the students’ Chinese as foreign language learning anxiety.
The participants of this study came from very diverse backgrounds. The cultural and linguistic diversity of each of the participants were likely to impact on how confident the finding drawn was in relation to the descriptors as African and Asian international students. Moreover, the participants were relatively small and limited to only one University. Thus, larger studies with more participants from several Universities might bring better results. Including variables like age, academic major and specific countries of origin could help to come up with more comprehensive results. Besides, it would have been better to include qualitative data that can corroborate, update or illustrate the quantitative data such as individual or group interviews to understand the reasons underlying Chinese as a foreign language learning anxiety of students and what makes them motivated.
Note: Asia-in the context of this study refers to all countries in the continent except China.