Total views : 145

A Field Study of Thermal and Visual Performance of Self-Shading Energy Commission Diamond Building, Putrajaya, Malaysia

Affiliations

  • Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia

Abstract


Objectives: This study investigates daylighting condition and cooling effects of a self-shading Energy Commission Diamond building in Putrajaya, Malaysia, using field measurements. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The field data were collected using a HD35ED series data logger measuring instrument with a HD35AP base unit. Findings: The results from the field measurement indicate that illuminance in the building resulting from daylighting alone are above 200 Lux. The average daylight factor is 2.7% which is within the acceptable range of indoor illuminance. From the calculations of OTTV, it is clearly shown that there is reductions of heat transfer into the Diamond building due to it incline wall facade that provide self-shading on the building. The average amount of sensible heat energy within the building is 45.8 KJ/Kg, with the west wing and the south wing indoor office spaces having a difference of about 1.5 KJ/Kg in their enthalpy. On an average, there is a total reduction of 30.6 KJ per unit volume of heat gain into the Diamond building based on the enthalpy change. Considering occupants comfort and wellbeing in the building, the daylighting requirements and heat gain in the building are acceptable. Applications/Improvement: This result is an indication that self-shading in buildings provides efficient daylighting and cooling which in turn reduces the building energy consumption.

Keywords

Daylighting, Energy Commission Building, Self-Shading, Thermal Performance.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 166)

References


  • Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P, Bourrelle JS, et al. Zero energy building - A review of definitions and calculation methodologies.Energy Build. 2011; 43(4):971–9.
  • Zhao ZY, Lu QL, Zuo J, Zillante G. Prediction system for change management in construction project. J Construction Engineering Management. 2010; 136(6):659–69.
  • Xin HZ, Rao SP. Active energy conserving strategies of the Malaysia Energy Commission Diamond Building. The 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Future for Human Security SUSTAIN 2012; 2012. p. 775–84.
  • Chan SA. Energy efficiency: Designing low energy buildings.Seminar, Pertubuhan Arkitek Malaysia (PAM); 2004.
  • Saidur R. Energy consumption, energy saving and emission analysis in Malaysian office buildings. Energy Policy. 2009; 37(10):4104–13.
  • Cambiaso F. Architectural integration of dynamic and innovative technologies for energy saving. CISBAT 2013: Cleantech for Smart Cities and Buildings from Nano to Urban Scale. Lausanne, Switzerland: EPFL; 2013. p. 79–84.
  • Chia SL. Minimizing solar insulation in high-rise buildings through self-shaded form. Journal of Applied Sciences.2008; 12:897–901.
  • Malaysian Standard. MS1525 (1st revision). 2007.
  • Lam JC, Tsang C, Li DHW, Cheng S. Residential building envelope heat gain and cooling energy requirements.Energy. 2005; 30(7):933–51.
  • Kuhn TE, Buhler C, Platzer WJ. Evaluation of overheating protection with Sun-shading systems. Sol Energy. 2001; 69:59–74.
  • Djamila H, Ming CC, Kumaresan S. Estimation of exterior vertical daylight for the humid tropic of Kota Kinabalm ciity in East Malaysia. Renew Energy. 2011; 36(1):9–15.
  • Zain-Ahmed A, Sopian K, Othman M, Sayigh A, Surendran P. Daylighting as a passive solar design strategy in tropi cal buildings: A case study of Malaysia. Energy Conserv Manag. 2002; 43(13):1725–36.
  • Nikpour M. Heat gain and daylighting assessment in self shading office building. 2013.
  • Todorvic MS. BPS, energy efficiency and renewable energy sources or buildings greening and zero energy cities planning harmony and ethics of sustainability. Energy Build; 2012. p. 180–9.
  • Leung E, Mar P. Energy efficiency in buildings in Asia: Realising the untapped opportunity. 2013.
  • Kwong QJ, Tang SH, Adam NM. Thermal comfort evaluation of the enclosed transitional space in tropical buildings: Subjective Response and computational fluid dynamics simulation. Journal of Applied Science. 2009; 9:3480–90.
  • Bhaskoro PT, Gilani SIUH. Transient cooling load characteristic of an academic building using TRNSYS. J Appl Sci.2011; 11:1777–83.
  • Sulaiman SA, Hassan AH. Analysis of annual cooling energy requirements for glazed academic buildings. J Appl Sci. 2011; 11:2024–9.
  • Sulaiman SA, Hassan AH. A study on the impact of operational behaviour on cooling energy in high-glazed academic buildings in a tropical country. Trends Applied Science Research. 2011; 6:1256–69.
  • Capeluto IG. Energy performance of self-shading building envelope. Energy Build. 2003; 35:327–36.
  • Optimum overhangs geometry for high-rise office building energy saving in tropical climates. 2005.Available from: http://eprints.utm.my/4305/2/ DilshanRemazOssenFBD2005ABS.pdf
  • Lim WY. Internal shading for efficient tropical daylighting in high-rise open plan office. Indoor and Built Environment; 2011.
  • Shen H, Tzempelikos A. Evaluation of shading retrofitting strategies for energy savings in office buildings. Cleantech for Smart Cities and Buildings from Nano to Urban Scale.CISBAT 2013 International Conference Proceedings; Lausanne, Switzerland: EPFL; 2013.
  • Kandar MZ, Sulaiman MS, Rashid YR, Ossen DR, Aminatuzuhariah M. Buildings through Daylight Factor. Int J Civil, Architecture Structural Construction Engineering.2011; 5(11):52–7.
  • Al-Tamimi NAM, Fadzil SFS, Harun WMW. The effects of orientation, ventilation and varied WWR on the thermal performance of residential rooms in the tropics. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2011; 4(2):142–53.
  • Dubois MC, Blomsterberg A. Energy saving potential and strategies for electric lighting in future North European, low energy office buildings: A literature review. Energy Building. 2011; 43(10):2572–82.
  • Nielsen MV, Svendsen S, Jensen LB. Quantifying the potential of automated dynamic solar shading in office buildings through integrated simulations of energy and daylight.Solar Energy. 2011; 85(5):757–68.
  • Ralegaonkar RV, Gupta R. Review of intelligent building construction: A passive solar architecture approach.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review. 2010; 14(8):2238–42.
  • Liping W, Hien WN. The impacts of ventilation strategies and facade on indoor thermal environment for naturally ventilated residential buildings in Singapore. Build Environ.2007; 42(12):4006–15.
  • Sa’id ENA, Dodo YA, Khandar MZ, Ahmad MH. correlating visual comfort with green building index in an open plan office space. Life Science Journal. 2014; 11(10).
  • Darula S, Kundracik F, Kocifaj M, Kittler R. Tubular light guides: Estimation of indoor illuminance levels. Leukos.2010; 6(3):241–52.
  • Birru D, Wen YJ. Open-loop closed-loop integrated daylight and artificial light control with multipoint sensor calibration. 2012.
  • CIBSE. Code for interior lighting. London: The Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers. 1994.
  • Dubios MC. Impact of solar shading devices on daylight quality: Simulation with Radiance. Rep No. TABK-01/3062.2001.
  • How to use psychrometric chart. 2015. Available from: http://www.mp-int.com/documents/

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.