Total views : 74

Assessment of Speckle Noise Reduction in Digital Images using Nonlinear Anisotropic Diffusion: An Experimental Investigation


  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Raipur, G.E. Road, Raipur – 492010, Chhattisgarh, India


Objectives: To investigate on choice of suitable image quality assessment techniques and effect of parameters such as gradient threshold, time step, number of iterations etc. on anisotropic diffusion filtering. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Various diffusivity functions and the individual contribution of associated parameters are compiled and evaluated. Edge preservation in smoothing is an important issue while filtering digital images. A recently proposed image quality metrics is used for evaluating the edge preserving ability of filters. A comparative study is carried out on the basis of experiments and their performance is tested on standard test images using 16 different image quality metrics. Findings: The experimental findings show that most of the true edges got lost for higher number of iterations along with more smoothening of images in techniques namely, Perona and Malik diffusion, Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion (SRAD) and Weickert anisotropic diffusion. Further, in robust anisotropic diffusion it is found that conduction coefficient plays significant role in filtering process. Higher value of conduction coefficient results in more smoothening with blurring of sharp details and edges. It is concluded that image quality measures such as universal Quality index (Q), Edge Retrieval Index (ERI) and Structural Content (SC) can give significant information about image quality even in cases where conventional image quality metrics such as Picture Signal To Noise Ratio (PSNR), Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), geometric average error (GAE), normalized absolute error (NAE) etc. fail to do so. Proposed approach can give significant information when conventional metrics fail to assess the filtered image quality. Application/Improvements: The behavioural characteristics of techniques studied will be suggestive when applied on real time noisy images such as ultrasound images which inherently contain speckle.


Diffusion, Diffusivity Function, Edge Preservation, Edge Retrieval Index, Noise Filtering, Speckle.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 46)


  • Krissian K, Westin CF, Kikinis R,Vosburgh KG. Oriented speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2007 May; 16(5):1412–24. CrossRef. PMid:17491469
  • Perona P, Malik J. Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1990 Jul; 12(7):629–39. CrossRef.
  • Gu Y, Yu X, Cui Z, Wang L, Xiu C. Detail preserving despeckling under multiscale anisotropic diffusion in medical ultrasound images. Proc 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics; 2011. p. 245–9. CrossRef.
  • Nordstrom KN. Biased anisotropic diffusion- A unified regularization and diffusion approach to edge detection. Image and Vision Computing. 1990; 8:318–27. CrossRef.
  • Weickert J. Anisotropic diffusion in image processing. Stuttgart, Germany: Teubner; 1998. p. 1–184.
  • Black MJ, Sapiro G, Marimont DH, Marimont, Heeger D. Robust anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 1998 Mar; 7(3):421–32. CrossRef. PMid:18276262
  • You YL, Xu W, Tannenbaum A, Kaveh M. Behavioral analysis of anisotropic diffusion in image processing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 1996 Nov; 5(11):1539– 53. CrossRef.PMid:18290071
  • Yu Y, Acton S. Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2002 Nov; 11(11):1260– 70. CrossRef. PMid:18249696
  • Loizou CP, Pattichis CS, Christodoulou CI, Istepanian RSH, Pantziaris M, Nicolaides A. Comparitive evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 2005 Oct; 52(10):1653–69. CrossRef. PMid:16382618
  • Weickert J, Romeny BMTH, Viergever MA. Efficient and reliable schemes for non linear diffusion filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 1998 Mar; 7(3):398– 410. CrossRef. PMid:18276260
  • Gerig G, Kubler O, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA. Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.1992 Jun; 11(2):221–32. CrossRef. PMid:18218376
  • Lee JS. Speckle suppression and analysis for synthetic aperture radar. Opt Eng. 1986; 25:636–43. CrossRef.
  • Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugam KS, Holtzman JC. A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1982 Mar; 4(2):157–65. CrossRef.PMid:21869022
  • Ham B, Min D, Sohn K. Revisiting the relationship between adaptive smoothing and anisotropic diffusion with modified filters. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2013 Mar; 22(3):1096–107. CrossRef. PMid:23193236
  • Singh BK, Verma K, Thoke AS. Objective and optical evaluation of despeckle filters in breast ultrasound images. IETE Technical Review; 2015. p. 1–15. CrossRef.
  • Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1986 Nov; 8(6):679–98. CrossRef. PMid:21869365
  • Loizou CP, Pattichis CS, Pantziaris M, Tyllis T, Nicolaides A. Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 Apr; 44:414–26. CrossRef. PMid:16937183
  • Mateo JL, Caballero AF. Finding out general tendencies in speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009; 36:7786–97. CrossRef.
  • Kim HS, Yoo JM, Park MS, Dinh TN, Lee GS. An anisotropic diffusion based on diagonal edges. Proc ICACT; 2007. p. 384–8. CrossRef.
  • Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2004 Apr; 13(4):600–12. CrossRef.PMid:15376593
  • Eskicioglu AM, Fisher PS. Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Transactions on Communications. 1995 Dec; 43(12):2959–65. CrossRef.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.