Comparative Analysis of Pathology of Introduced and Indigenous Tree Species in Urban Plantings of Voronezh

nbsp Vladimir V  Tsaralunga; Anna V  Tsaralunga and Aleksandra K  Razinkova

doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i29/89838

Article

Comparative Analysis of Pathology of Introduced and Indigenous Tree Species in Urban Plantings of Voronezh

VIEWS 751
PDF 168

Abstract
Full-Text HTML
Full-Text PDF
How to Cite

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i29/89838

Year: 2016, Volume: 9, Issue: 29, Pages: 1-6

Original Article

Comparative Analysis of Pathology of Introduced and Indigenous Tree Species in Urban Plantings of Voronezh

Vladimir V. Tsaralunga^*, Anna V. Tsaralunga and Aleksandra K. Razinkova

Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov, [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
*Author for correspondence
Vladimir V. Tsaralunga
Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G.F. Morozov,
Email:[email protected]

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

One of the problems of urban planting is the necessity for choosing between indigenous and introduced tree species. Under conditions of Voronezh, Russia, the ratio is 1:4 in favor of the former, though the many years’ experience shows that it is not substantiated from the perspective of vital capacity of trees in urban environment. The conducted research showed that the most popular introducents in the city (common horse chestnut, Lombardy poplar) are in better condition than the indigenous species (tillet, drooping birch, Norway maple). This difference is especially seen in linear, street, and riverside plantings.
Keywords: Indigenous Tree Species, Introducents, Pathological Characteristics of Trees, Tree Pathologies, Urban Plantings