Indian Journal of Science and Technology
Year: 2017, Volume: 10, Issue: 35, Pages: 1-13
Samriti Mahajan1* and Vikas Soni2
1School of Management Sciences, Lingaya’s University, Nachauli, Jasana Road, Old Faridabad, Faridabad – 121002, Haryana, India; [email protected] 2Project Management, FEPL, Faridabad – 121006, Haryana, India; [email protected]
*Author for the correspondence:
School of Management Sciences, Lingaya’s University, Nachauli, Jasana Road, Old Faridabad, Faridabad – 121002, Haryana, India; [email protected]
Learning administration can assume a fundamental part through guaranteeing the accessibility and availability of precise and solid debacle chance data when required and through viable lesson learning. Recognizable proof of key debacle information components will be an empowering influence to oversee catastrophes effectively. Each nation and group is powerless against calamities, both characteristic and artificial. Country’s geoclimatic state besides its hoisted condition of financial acknowledgement makes it by walking most extreme fiasco nation on the planet to encounter all the time from different cataclysmic events, in particular dry spell, surge, violent wind, earth tremor, avalanches, volcanic emission, and so forth. The objective behind this paper is to exhibit key learning factors identifying with debacle administration cycle, and investigates a couple of difficulties identifying with recognized catastrophe information factors. Methods/Statistical Analysis: India has 84% of its geological range under precipitous territory. The India is inclined to different catastrophic events, for example, tremor, avalanche, streak surge, and so forth. Individuals and the administration have learnt a great deal from the past encounters and in this manner a procedure of group based debacle administration is being created to deal with the calamities. The examination depends on the information &data gathered throughout the previous years (1970‐2016). A list of disaster knowledge factors was first identified through a comprehensive literature review and later semi‐structured interviews were conducted among few disaster management practitioners to explore the influence and challenges relating to identify knowledge factors. Findings: In view of the connection of one occasion each under the classification of normal and manmade fiascos (avalanches, transport mishaps’) it is presumed that these relationships set up that the toll of mischance is ordinarily more than the calamity occasions and there exists a squeezing need to give careful consideration towards overseeing mischance that take substantial toll of the worldwide assets. Among key difficulties, the absence of recognition and cautioning frameworks, the requirement for compelling instruction, preparing and mindfulness raising projects, the requirements’ for general refreshing of fiasco related laws, absence of assets for monetary arranging measures, lack of foresight, poor correspondence, poor initiative, and poor institutional game plan were featured. Improvements: Group support in a fiasco is a typical marvel in the nations like India. Considering the tremendous capability of group and putting its investment into training in various phases of debacle administration (counteractive action, readiness, relief, reaction and recovery) will surely assist the catastrophe supervisors with making a more secure society. At display there exists no formal and exhaustive database recording the toll of mishaps and the investigation depends on the database gathered from various sources. The paper builds up certain that the extent of the toll of mischances is significantly more than that of fiascos and there exists squeezing requirement for overseeing mishaps.
Keywords: Antecedents of Disaster, Calamity Occasions, Disaster Management, Inevitable Accidents, Mitigation Strategy
Subscribe now for latest articles and news.