Effectiveness of Community Forest Management as an Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Strategy in the Context of Nepal

Sushila Rijal  lowast; Sutinee Sinutok

doi:10.17485/IJST/v17i28.705

Article

Effectiveness of Community Forest Management as an Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Strategy in the Context of Nepal

VIEWS 206
PDF 44

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

DOI: 10.17485/IJST/v17i28.705

Year: 2024, Volume: 17, Issue: 28, Pages: 2880-2888

Original Article

Effectiveness of Community Forest Management as an Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Strategy in the Context of Nepal

Sushila Rijal^1∗, Sutinee Sinutok¹

¹Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, HatYai, 90110, Thailand

*Corresponding Author
Email: [email protected]

Received Date:10 March 2024, Accepted Date:07 May 2024, Published Date:20 July 2024

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Objectives: This study attempted to explore the effectiveness of community forest (CF) management as an ecosystem based adaptation (EbA) strategy in combating and adapting with the climate change impacts upon local ecosystems and communities. Method: In order to identify EbA options, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, governance and socioeconomic function of CF were analyzed. Effectiveness and sustainability were examined and compared through Land Use Land Cover (LULC) database during 1996 and 2021. Efficiency was explored through the economic valuation of provisioning and cultural services, using economic approach–revealed price (market price) method. Socioeconomic functions and governance were examined through the existing plans/policies and secondary data review. Findings: CF is effectively and sustainably managing the available resources. It has increased forest cover, water body, grassland and remarkable decline in bush and sand area. Bush area (79.25 ha in 1996) dropped (to 6.52 ha in 2021) while forest cover increased from 340.46 ha to 375.54 ha. Waterbody (pond or lake area) was limited to 0.88 ha that expanded to 5.04 ha in 2021 due to the conservation oriented management practices. Meanwhile, economic value of provisioning services is USD 7182 accounting wood and timber the highest (average annual USD 4800) among the provisioning services while average annual value of firewood and poles is USD 1367 and NTFP (fish and rubber) is USD 1015 whereas the economic value of cultural services is USD 18803. Novelty: The novelty of the research work lies in the unique methodology and the selection of CF for the EbA case study, which is least explored. By exposing the integration of ecological and socio-economic considerations, this research underscores the significance CF as EbA option in shaping sustainable development pathway in Nepalese context.

Keywords: Ecosystem Services, Ecosystem Based Adaptation, Community Forest, Nepal, Land Management

References

Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Younis I. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6
Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, et al. 5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Global Warming of 1.5°C.An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1. 2018. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
DHM. Observed Climate Trend Analysis of Nepal, (1971-2014). Department of Hydrology and Metereology, Government of Nepal. Kathmandu. 1971. Available from: https://www.dhm.gov.np/uploads/dhm/climateService/Observed_Climate_Trend_Analysis_Report_2017.pdf
MoFE. Climate change scenarios for Nepal. National Adaptation Plan. Ministry of Forest and Environment, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu. Government of Nepal, Kathmandu. 2019.
UNDRR. Disaster Risk Reduction in Nepal. Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction-Regional Office for Asia and Pacific. Asian Disaster Preparedness Center. 2019. Available from: https://www.undrr.org/publication/disaster-risk-reduction-nepal
Eckstein D, Hutfils ML, Winges M. Global climate risk index 2019. 2018.
MoHA. Nepal Disaster report, 2019. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu. Kathmandu. 2019.
GoN. National Adaptation Plan (NAP) of Nepal, 2021-2050. Government of Nepal, Singhadurbar Kathmandu. 2021. Available from: https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/national-adaption-plan-nap-2021-2050-nepal
MoHA. Ministry of Home Affairs.Nepal Disaster Report,: The Road to Sendai, Kathmandu: Government of Nepal. 2017. Available from: https://www.undp.org/nepal/publications/nepal-disaster-report-2017-road-sendai
Wester P, Mishra A, Mukherji A, Shrestha AB. The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment:mountains,climate change, sustainability and people. Nature. Springer. 2019.
Chanza N, Musakwa W. Indigenous practices of ecosystem management in a changing climate: Prospects for ecosystem-based adaptation. Environmental Science & Policy. 2021;126:142–151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.005
Moreno-Mateos D, Alberdi A, Morriën E, Putten WHVD, Rodríguez-Uña A, Montoya D. The long-term restoration of ecosystem complexity. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2020;4:676–685. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1154-1
Donatti CI, Harvey CA, Hole D, Panfil SN, Schurman H. Indicators to measure the climate change adaptation outcomes of ecosystem-based adaptation. Climatic Change. 2020;158:413–433. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02565-9
Sandholz S. Potential for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in the urban landscape of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. 2016. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_15
Fu C, Vijitpan T, Bogati R, Shrestha TK, Wang G. Participatory Process for Implementing Ecosystem-based Adaptation in a Mountainous District of Nepal. Handbook of Climate Change Management: Research, Leadership, Transformation. 2021;p. 3031–3045. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57281-5_331
Devkota S, Shrestha UB, Poudel S, Chaudhary RP. Mushrooms in the Mountains: Assessing the Role of Fungi on the Ecosystem-Based Adaptation (EbA) Practices in Nepal Himalaya. Journal of Resources and Ecology. 1037;13:1030–1036. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.06.008
Klein JA, Tucker CM, Steger CE, Nolin A, Reid R, Hopping KA, et al. An integrated community and ecosystem-based approach to disaster risk reduction in mountain systems. Environmental science & policy. 2019;94:143–152. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.034
Karki S, Yokota S. Paddy Farmers’ Ecosystem-Based Flood Risk Mitigation and Important Factors for Community-Based Adaptation in Terai, Nepal. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4661173
Rijal S, Sinutok S, Techato K, Gentle P, Khanal U, Gyawali S. Contribution of Community-Managed Sal-Based Forest in Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: A Case from Nepal. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020262
Chitale VS, Thapa S, Matin MA, Gurung K, Adhikari S, Maharjan R. Climate-Resilient Forest Management in Nepal. In Earth Observation Science and Applications for Risk Reduction and Enhanced Resilience in Hindu Kush Himalaya Region: A Decade of Experience from SERVIR. (pp. 127-145) Cham. 2021.
Poudyal BH, Khatri DB, Paudel D, Marquardt K, Khatri S. Examining forest transition and collective action in Nepal’s community forestry. Land Use Policy. 2023;134:106872. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106872
Paudel G, Carr J, Munro PG. Community forestry in Nepal: a critical review. International Forestry Review. 2022;24(1):43–58. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1505/146554822835224810
Ghimire P, Lamichhane U. Community Based Forest Management in Nepal: Current Status, Successes and Challenges. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources. 2020;3(2):16–29. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.03022
Rijal S, Gentle P, Khanal U, Wilson C, Rimal B. A systematic review of Nepalese farmers’ climate change adaptation strategies. Climate Policy. 2022;22(1):132–146. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1977600
Khanal U, Wilson C, Hoang VN, Lee BL. Autonomous adaptations to climate change and rice productivity: a case study of the Tanahun district, Nepal. Climate and Development. 2019;11(7):555–563. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1469965
Prasain S. Climate change adaptation measure on agricultural communities of Dhye in Upper Mustang, Nepal. Climatic Change. 2018;148(1-2):279–291. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2187-1
Bhattarai S, Regmi BR, Pant B, Uprety DR, Maraseni T. Sustaining ecosystem based adaptation: The lessons from policy and practices in Nepal. Land Use Policy. 2021;104:105391. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105391
GoN. Topographical Map of Nepal. Department of Survey, Government of Nepal. 1996.
Acharya RP, Maraseni T, Cockfield G. Assessing the financial contribution and carbon emission pattern of provisioning ecosystem services in Siwalik forests in Nepal: Valuation from the perspectives of disaggregated users. Land Use Policy. 2020;95:104647. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104647
Rijal S, Techato K, Gyawali S, Stork N, Dangal MR, Sinutok S. Forest Cover Change and Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Community Forest in Mechinagar and Buddhashanti Landscape (MBL), Nepal. Environmental Management. 2021;67(5):963–973. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01430-9
JCF. Jamunbari Community Forest, Jamunkhadi Wetland Conservation, Ecotourism promotion and Management Action plan, Jhapa, Nepal. Jhapa, Nepal. 2015.
JCF. Jamunbari Community Forest, Operational Plan, 2014. Third Edition, Jhapa, Nepal. Jhapa, Nepal. 2014.
Smith AC, Hurni K, Fox J, Den V, Hoek J. Community forest management led to rapid local forest gain in Nepal: A 29 year mixed methods retrospective case study. Land Use Policy. 2023;126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106526
Tripathi S, Subedi R, Adhikari H. Forest Cover Change Pattern after the Intervention of Community Forestry Management System in the Mid-Hill of Nepal: A Case Study. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172756
Temgoua LF, Ajonina G, Woyu HB. Land use and land cover change analysis in Ajei upland watershed community forest. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2018;6:83–99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2018.69007
Cerrillo RMN, Vieira DJ, Ochoa-Gaona S, Jong BHJD, Delgado DM, Serrano M. Land cover changes and fragmentation in mountain neotropical ecosystems of Oaxaca, Mexico under community forest management. Journal of Forestry Research. 2019;30:143–155. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0568-3
Lonn P, Mizoue N, Ota T, Kajisa T, Yoshida S. Evaluating the contribution of community-based ecotourism (CBET) to household income and livelihood changes: A case study of the Chambok CBET program in Cambodia. Ecological Economics. 2018;151:62–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.036
Brandt JS, Buckley RC. A global systematic review of empirical evidence of ecotourism impacts on forests in biodiversity hotspots. 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.004
Lonn P, Mizoue N, Ota T, Kajisa T, Yoshida S. Using forest cover maps and local people’s perceptions to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based ecotourism for forest conservation in Chambok (Cambodia) Environmental conservation. 2019;46:111–117. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892918000462
Duguma LA, Atela J, Ayana AN, Alemagi D, Mpanda M, Nyago M, et al. Community forestry frameworks in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact on sustainable development. Ecology and Society. 2018;23. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796867
Burivalova Z, Hua F, Koh LP, Garcia C, Putz F. A critical comparison of conventional, certified, and community management of tropical forests for timber in terms of environmental, economic, and social variables. Conservation Letters. 2017;10:4–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12244
Ekanayake EMBP, Xie Y, Ahmad S, Geldard RP, Nissanka AH. Community Forestry for livelihood Improvement: evidence from the intermediate zone, Sri lanka. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2022;41:1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2020.1794906
Foncha JN, Ewule DM. Community Forest Management: A Strategy for Rehabilitation, Conservation and Livelihood Sustainability: The Case of Mount Oku, Cameroon. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2020.82001
MoE. National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) to Climate Change. 2010. Available from: https://adaptation-undp.org/resources/assessments-and-background-documents/nepal-national-adaptation-programme-action-napa
MoFE. Nepal National REDD+ Strategy. Ministry of Forests and Environment. Singhadurbar, Kathmandu. Singhadurbar, Kathmandu. 2018.
GoN,. National Framework on Local Adaptation Plans for Action. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Environment, Singhdurbar. 2011. Available from: https://www.climatenepal.org.np/resources/national-framework-local-adaptation-plan-action-lapa
MoPE, Nepal Climate Change Policy, 2076, Ministry of Population and Environment, Government of Nepal. Kathmandu. 2019. Available from: https://climate.mohp.gov.np/31-acts/153-climate-change-policy

Copyright

© 2024 Rijal & Sinutok. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee)