• P-ISSN 0974-6846 E-ISSN 0974-5645

Indian Journal of Science and Technology


Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Year: 2023, Volume: 16, Issue: 31, Pages: 2469-2479

Original Article

Post-Installation Smart Meter and Billing Service Quality Assessments

Received Date:11 March 2023, Accepted Date:01 July 2023, Published Date:21 August 2023


Background/Objectives: The Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG) introduced meters since its establishment. Although meters have undergone several technologically innovative phases, customers face challenges. The study examines the relationship between perceived quality and customer satisfaction concerning these meters. It also investigates the mediating role of meter brands between perceived quality and customer satisfaction. Methods: Four hundred and seventy (470) questionnaires were distributed to ECG Customers. Three hundred twenty-four (324) questionnaires were returned for analysis. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Findings: The results demonstrate a highly significant positive relationship (b = 0.701; p = 0.000) between Perceived Quality and Customer Satisfaction. In addition, the mediator, the meter brand, shows a positive and significant relationship between perceived quality and customer satisfaction (b = -0.150; p = 0.038). However, no significant relationship between meter brand and customer satisfaction was found (b = 050; p = 0.261). Novelty: This finding emphasizes the significance of a smart meter’s perceived quality in predicting customer satisfaction, which shows that the service provider is perceived to be credible and reliable among customers. The finding can assist ECG in improving their managerial and operational strategies and policies, thereby increasing profit. The findings also underscore that customers do not view brands as determinants of the perceived quality of the meters; hence, they should focus more on the issuance or installation quality of the meters.

Keywords: Perceived Quality; Customer Satisfaction; Smart Meter; Meter Brand And Challenges 1


  1. Ogbuefi UC, Ene PC, Okoro PA. Prepaid meter tariffing for actual power consumption in an average house hold: A case study of Nigeria DISCOs. Nigerian Journal of Technology. 2019;38(3):750. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v38i3.29
  2. Kambule N, Yessoufou K, Nwulu N. A review and identification of persistent and emerging prepaid electricity meter trends. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2018;43:173–185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.01.007
  3. Batalla-Bejerano J, Trujillo-Baute E, Villa-Arrieta M. Smart meters and consumer behaviour: Insights from the empirical literature. Energy Policy. 2020;144:111610. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111610
  4. Aubel PV, Poll E. Smart metering in the Netherlands: What, how, and why. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2019;109:719–725. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.01.001
  5. Alam N, Al-Amri HA. Service Quality Perception and Customer Satisfaction in Islamic Banks of Oman. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020;7(9):499–504.
  6. Agarwal I, Gowda KR. The effect of airline service quality on customer satisfaction and loyalty in India. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021;37(2):1341–1348. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.557
  7. Slack N, Singh G, Sharma S. Impact of perceived value on the satisfaction of supermarket customers: developing country perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2020;48(11):1235–1254. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-03-2019-0099
  8. Dam SM, Dam TC. Relationships between Service Quality, Brand Image, Customer Satisfaction, and Customer Loyalty. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business . 2021;8(3):585–593. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0585
  9. Liu KNN, Tsai NI, Xiao Q, Hu C. The impact of experience on brand loyalty: Mediating effect of images of Taiwan hotels. Journal of China Tourism Research. 2021;17(3):395–414.
  10. Samudro A, Sumarwan U, Simanjuntak M, Yusuf EZ. Assessing the effects of perceived quality and perceived value on customer satisfaction. Management Science Letters. 2020;10(5):1077–1084. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.001
  11. Sreejesh S, Sarkar JG, Sarkar A, Eshghi A. The impact of other customer perceptions on consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Service Theory and Practice. 2018;28(2):130–146. Available from: https://doi.org/0.1108/JSTP-11-2016-0207
  12. Dongre Y, Ingle R. An Investigation of QoS Criteria for Optimal Services Selection in Composition. 2020 2nd International Conference on Innovative Mechanisms for Industry Applications (ICIMIA). 2020;p. 705–710. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMIA48430.2020.9074950
  13. Waluya AI, Iqbal MA, Indradewa R. How product quality, brand image, and customer satisfaction affect the purchase decisions of Indonesian automotive customers. International Journal of Services, Economics and Management. 2019;10(2):177. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSEM.2019.100944
  14. Joudeh JMM, Dandis AO. Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in an Internet Service Providers. International Journal of Business and Management. 2018;13(8):108. Available from: https://doi.org/0.5539/ijbm.v13n8p108
  15. Pooya A, Khorasani MA, Ghouzhdi SG. Investigating the effect of perceived quality of self-service banking on customer satisfaction. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. 2020;13(2):263–280. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-12-2018-0440
  16. Prentice C, Wang X, Loureiro SMC. The influence of brand experience and service quality on customer engagement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2019;50:50–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.020
  17. Carmine EG, Zeller R. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park CA Sage Publ. 1979.
  18. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) European Business Review. 2021;26(2):106–121. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  19. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 2019;31(1):2–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203


© 2023 Matey et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee)


Subscribe now for latest articles and news.