• P-ISSN 0974-6846 E-ISSN 0974-5645

Indian Journal of Science and Technology


Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Year: 2021, Volume: 14, Issue: 37, Pages: 2865-2870

Original Article

Comparative Historical Trends of Faculty Performance in Instruction, Research and Extension in a Philippine State University

Received Date:28 May 2021, Accepted Date:02 September 2021, Published Date:09 November 2021


Objectives: This research focused on the determining the difference of faculty performance in instruction, research and extension in the last 3 years. Methods: The researcher used mean, variance percentage, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test to determine the difference of faculty performance from 2017-2018. Findings: The analyses revealed that there were positive variance percentages of faculty performance in instruction (+2.47%) and extension (+14.28%) while a negative variance percentage was recorded for research (-4.62%) from 2017-2018. Furthermore, a negative variance percentage for instruction (–0.43%), research (-12.9%) and extension (-25%) was recorded from 2018-2019. The same analysis also revealed that there is no significant difference of the faculty performance in instruction (p-value= .8704), research (p-value=0.48486) and extension (p-value=0.14412) from 2017-2019. The negative variance percentage is indicative of a waning productivity which can be attributed to many factors such as lack of time in the conduct of extension and research, lack of funding support and lack of community participation. Novelty: The result of the study can be utilized as inputs the creation of policies that are geared towards the improvement of faculty performance.

Keywords: trend; faculty performance; instruction; research; extension


  1. Payos RP. Human Resource Management: From Practitioner’s Point of View. Philippines. Rex Book Store, Inc. 2010.
  2. Beerens DR. Evaluating Teachers for Professional Growth: Creating a Culture of Motivation and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications. 2000.
  3. Johansen BCL, Verecio RL, Cinco JC, Quisumbing LA, Laurente ML. Faculty Performance Evaluation in A Philippine University Information Technology Program.
  4. Patimo D. ). Faculty performance evaluation system of state universities and colleges in the philippine eastern visayas region. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation. 2020;6(2):159–167. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.21009/jisae.062.06
  5. Warring DF. Teacher Evaluations: Use or Misuse? Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2015;3(10):703–709. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031007
  6. Obliopas RG, Madeja JB. Research policy redirection based on analysis of target- setting and accomplishment trends in a Philippine State University. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;13(34):3555–3560. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v13i34.1324
  7. Ranganathan P, Aggarwal R. Study designs: Part 1 - An overview and classification. Perspectives in clinical research. 2018;9(4):184–186. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_124_18
  8. Salkind NJ. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE Publications, Inc.. 2010. 10.4135/9781412961288
  9. Sawyer S. Analysis of Variance: The Fundamental Concepts. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2009;17(2):27E–38E. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/jmt.2009.17.2.27E


© 2021 Casillano et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee)


Subscribe now for latest articles and news.