Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Abstract

Objectives: This research focused on the determining the difference of faculty performance in instruction, research and extension in the last 3 years. Methods: The researcher used mean, variance percentage, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test to determine the difference of faculty performance from 2017-2018. Findings: The analyses revealed that there were positive variance percentages of faculty performance in instruction (+2.47%) and extension (+14.28%) while a negative variance percentage was recorded for research (-4.62%) from 2017-2018. Furthermore, a negative variance percentage for instruction (–0.43%), research (-12.9%) and extension (-25%) was recorded from 2018-2019. The same analysis also revealed that there is no significant difference of the faculty performance in instruction (p-value= .8704), research (p-value=0.48486) and extension (p-value=0.14412) from 2017-2019. The negative variance percentage is indicative of a waning productivity which can be attributed to many factors such as lack of time in the conduct of extension and research, lack of funding support and lack of community participation. Novelty: The result of the study can be utilized as inputs the creation of policies that are geared towards the improvement of faculty performance.

Keywords: trend; faculty performance; instruction; research; extension