COVID-19 research and publishing: Advance ambitiously, but cautiously, in 2021

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva

doi:10.17485/IJST/v14i10.92

Article

COVID-19 research and publishing: Advance ambitiously, but cautiously, in 2021

VIEWS 1971
PDF 214

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

DOI: 10.17485/IJST/v14i10.92

Year: 2021, Volume: 14, Issue: 10, Pages: 892-896

Original Article

COVID-19 research and publishing: Advance ambitiously, but cautiously, in 2021

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva ^1*

¹ Independent researcher, P. O. Box 7, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan

^*Corresponding author
email: [email protected]

Received Date:15 January 2021, Accepted Date:02 March 2021, Published Date:04 April 2021

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Objectives: This paper retrospectively reflects on opportunities and risks encountered in 2020 related to publishing COVID-19-related research, and offers perspectives on how researchers should proceed cautiously in 2021. Methods: Based on select literature, the author’s perspective, and case studies sourced primarily from PubMed, challenges in publishing COVID-19-related research observed in 2020 and early 2021 are described. Background problems and suggestions for possible solutions are provided. Findings: 2020 was highly transformative, not only for biomedical research as a direct result of a focus on COVID-19, but because many aspects of publishing were challenged. Some concerns that had already been emphasized recently, such as reproducibility, misinformation, or predatory publishing, were amplified in 2020, and carried over into 2021. Open data policies were more encouraged, but in select cases, they were weakly implemented. Applications: Both young and established researchers and academics alike, in their passionate desire to contribute to humanity’s advance in understanding COVID-19, need to appreciate several risks and perils that lie within academic publishing.

Keywords: COVID-19; correction of literature; ethics; pandemic; public health; retractions

References

John Hopkins University COVID-19 Research Center. Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed 2021-03-01)
NCBI/NIH/NLM.LitCovid. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/ (accessed 2021/03/01)
Teixeira da Silva JA, Tsigaris P, Erfanmanesh M. Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19. Scientometrics. 2021;126(1):831–842. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03675-3
Hartley K, Vu MK. Fighting fake news in the COVID-19 era: policy insights from an equilibrium model. Policy Sciences. 2020;53(4):735–758. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09405-z
Barua Z, Barua S, Aktar S, Kabir N, Li M. Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science. 2020;8:100119. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119
Roozenbeek J, Schneider CR, Dryhurst S, Kerr J, Freeman ALJ, Recchia G, et al. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science. 2020;7(10):201199. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
Loomba S, Figueiredo AD, Piatek SJ, Graaf KD, Larson HJ. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behaviour. 2021;5:337–348. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1
Montesi M. Understanding fake news during the Covid-19 health crisis from the perspective of information behaviour: The case of Spain. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2020. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000620949653
Szigeti R, Kellermayer D, Trakimas G, Kellermayer R. BCG epidemiology supports its protection against COVID-19? A word of caution. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240203. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240203
Mehra MR, Desai SS, Ruschitzka F, Patel AN. Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. The Lancet. 2020;p. 31324–31330. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31324-6; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6; "expression of concern" https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31290-3; "retraction" https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31324-6
Mehra MR, Desai SS, Kuy S, Henry TD, Patel AN. Cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2021225 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2007621; "expression of concern" https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2020822; "retraction" https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2021225
Teixeira da Silva JA. Misinformation in COVID-19 media and literature, with an emphasis on open data policies. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education. 2020;7(2):25–29.
Boschiero MN, Carvalho TA, Marson FAdL. Retraction in the era of COVID-19 and its influence on evidence-based medicine: is science in jeopardy? Pulmonology. 2021;27(2):97–106. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.10.011
Teixeira da Silva JA. Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations. Online Information Review. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0371
Teixeira da Silva JA, Bornemann-Cimenti H, Tsigaris P. Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2021;24(1):21–26. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09990-z
Teixeira da Silva JA. An alert to COVID-19 literature in predatory publishing venues. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2020;46(5):102187. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102187
Teixeira da Silva JA. Is there a clear division between predatory and low-quality journals and publishers? Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2020;50(4):458–459. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4997/jrcpe.2020.427
Gupta L, Gasparyan AY, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Zimba O, Yessirkepov M. Information and misinformation on COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2020;35(27):e256. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e256
Bramstedt KA. The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2020;46(12):803–807. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106494
Gajendran N, Shanthi V, Vendhan AM. Rejuvenation of online research interactive fora during COVID-19. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;13(47):4603–4605. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v13i47.2230
Boetto E, Golinelli D, Carullo G, Fantini MP. Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2020. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106639
Teixeira da Silva JA. Reasons for citing retracted literature are not straightforward, and solutions are complex. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2020;129(1):3. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00258.2020
Teixeira da Silva JA, Bornemann-Cimenti H. Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? Scientometrics. 2017;110(1):365–370. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2178-9
Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. Citing retracted papers affects education and librarianship, so distorted academic metrics need a correction. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2018;6(1):eP2199. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2258
Teixeira da Silva JA. Letter to the editor: Expression of concern. CORR Insights®: Preoperative pain sensitization is associated with postoperative pillar pain after open carpal tunnel release. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2021;479(1):212–213. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001597
Expression of concern. Vascular. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538120977849
The PO, Editors. The PLOS ONE Editors. Expression of concern: Vitamin D sufficiency, a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection. PLoS ONE. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240965
Lakens D. Pandemic researchers — recruit your own best critics. Nature. 2020;581(7807):121. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586 020-01392-8
Teixeira da Silva JA. Two disturbing trends about expressions of concern. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.004
Fioranelli M, Sepehri A, Roccia M, Jafferany M, Olisova OY, Lomonosov KM, et al. 5G technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells. Journal of Biological Regulators & Homeostatic Agents. 2020;34(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.23812/20-269-E-4
NLM Catalog. Journal of Biological Regulators & Homeostatic Agents. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/8809253 (accessed 2021/03/01)
Teixeira da Silva JA. ResearchGate preprint (not peer reviewed) 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19664.74243
Hunter P. The spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus. EMBO Reports. 2020;21(4):e50334. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202050334
Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J, Al-Khatib A. Legends in science: From boom to bust. Publishing Research Quarterly. 2016;32(4):313–318. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9476-1
Lipworth W, Gentgall M, Kerridge I, Stewart C. Science at warp speed: Medical research, publication, and translation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 2020;17(4):555–561. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10013-y
Kreps SE, Kriner DL. Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Advances. 2020;6(43):eabd4563. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4563
Teixeira da Silva JA. Corona exhaustion (CORONEX): COVID-19-induced exhaustion grinding down humanity. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences. 2021;2. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100014
Magoon R, Ohri R. Compounded research challenges amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 2020;39(6):689–690. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2020.09.002
Ma XT, Wang YQ, Gao T, He Q, He Y, Yue RS, et al. Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID-19 research. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2020;13(2):173–177. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12388
Dinis-Oliveira RJ. COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”. Forensic Sciences Research. 2020;5(2):174–187. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754
Teixeira da Silva JA. Use of Covid-19 as an illegitimate excuse, or as a scape-goat. Gazeta Médica. 2020;7(4):396–397. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29315/gm.v7i4.409

Copyright

© 2021 Teixeira da Silva.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee).