Indian Journal of Science and Technology

References

1. Jena P. Successful Learners of Distance Education: A case study of IGNOU. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field. 2020;6(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.2015/IJIRMF.2455.0620/202004027
2. Jadhav VR, Bagul TD, Aswale SR. COVID-19 era: students’ role to look at problems in education system during lockdown issues in Maharashtra. India. International Journal of Research and Review. 2020;7(5):328–331.
3. Rajhans V, Memon U, Patil V, Goyal A. Impact of COVID-19 on academic activities and way forward in Indian Optometry. Journal of Optometry. 2020;13(4):216–226. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.06.002
4. Kapasia N, Paul P, Roy A, Saha J, Zaveri A, Mallick R, et al. Impact of lockdown on learning status of undergraduate and postgraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic in West Bengal, India. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020;116. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105194
5. Tsai CC, Chuang SC, Liang JC, Tsai MJ. Self-efficacy in Internet-based Learning Environments: A Literature Review. Educational Technology & Society. 2011;14(4):222–240.
6. Ligorio MB, Van Veen K. Constructing a successful crossnational virtual learning environment in primary and secondary education. AACE Journal. 2006;14(2):103–128.
7. Tsai MJ. The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating student e-learning from metacognitive perspectives. Educational Technology & Society. 2009;12(1):34–48.
8. Frank M, Reich N, Humphreys K. Respecting the human needs of students in the development of e-learning. Computers & Education. 2003;40(1):57–70. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(02)00095-7
9. Akaslan D, Law ELC, Taşkın K. Analysing Issues for Applying E-learning to the Subject of Electricity in Higher Education in Turkey. In: The Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Education. 2011.
10. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ. Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science. 2001;12(5):353–359. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00366
11. Dhawan S. How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2004;36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
12. Gilbert PK. How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2004;36(1).
13. Baxter JA, Haycock J. International review of research in open and distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2014;15(1).
14. Kramarski B, Gutman M. How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2006;22(1):24–33. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
15. Quintana C, Zhang M, Krajcik J. A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding. Educational Psychologist. 2005;40(4):235–244. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5
16. Linn MC, Davis EA. PB., ed. Internet environments for science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 2004.
17. Miller SM, Miller KL. BA., ed. Theoretical and practical considerations in the design of web-based instruction. IDEA Group Publishing. 2000.
18. Wiesenberg F, Stacey E. Teaching philosophy: Moving from face-to-face to online classrooms. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education. 2008;34(1):63–69.
19. Sareen S, Nangia A. Attitude and Challenges faced by School Teachers. Dr.International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity. 11:3012–3018. Available from: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJDRBC/article/view/29890/16570
20. Guasch T, Alvarez I, Espasa A. University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2010;26:199–206. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018
21. Cho MH, Tobias S. Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2016;17:123–140. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2342
22. Kreber C, Kanuka H. The scholarship of teaching and learning and the online classroom. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education. 2006;32(2):109–131. Available from: http://www.extension.usask.ca/cjuce
23. Choi B. How people learn in an asynchronous online learning environment: The relationships between graduate students’ learning strategies and learning satisfaction | Comment apprennent les gens dans un environnement d’apprentissage en ligne asynchrone. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 2016;42(1).
24. Gaytan J, McEwen BC. Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies. American Journal of Distance Education. 2007;21(3):117–132. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
25. Brooks CF. Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty‐first century: blending online communities of practice and face‐to‐face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2010;47(3):261–270. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498177
26. Alonso F, Manrique D, Martinez L, Vines JM. How Blended Learning Reduces Underachievement in Higher Education: An Experience in Teaching Computer Sciences. IEEE Transactions on Education. 2011;54(3):471–478. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/te.2010.2083665
27. Saghafi MR, Franz J, Crowther PH. A Holistic Model for Blended Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 2014;25(4):531–549.
28. Auguskani JPL, . A study on faculty perspective towards alternative teaching practices (E-Learning — Blackboard) during COVID 19. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;13(34):3538–3548. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v13i34.1205
29. Jena P. International Journal of Advanced Education and Research. 2020. 5(3):77–81.
30. Tambouris E, Zotou M, Tarabanis K. Towards designing cognitively-enriched project-oriented courses within a blended prob-lem-based learning context. 2014.
31. Israel MJ. Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2015;16(5):102–118.
32. Bolsen T, Evans M, Fleming AM. A Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Approaches to Teaching Introduction to American Government. Journal of Political Science Education. 2016;12(3):302–317. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1090905
33. Westermann EB. A Half-Flipped Classroom or an Alternative Approach?: Primary Sources and Blended Learning. Educational Research Quarterly. 2014;38(2):43–57.
34. González-Gómez D, Jeong JS, Rodríguez DA, Cañada-Cañada F. Performance and Perception in the Flipped Learning Model: An Initial Approach to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Teaching Methodology in a General Science Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2016;25(3):450–459. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9
35. Beth AD, Jordan ME, Schallert DL, Reed JH, Kim M. Responsibility and generativity in online learningz communities. Interactive Learning Environments. 2015;23(4):471–484.
36. Fedynich L, Bradley KS, Bradley J. Graduate students’ perceptions of online learning. Research in Higher Education Journal. 2015;27(1):1–13.
37. Chigeza P, Halbert K. Navigating E-Learning and blended learning for pre-service teachers: Redesigning for engagement, access and efficiency. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2014;39(11). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n11.8
38. Tomas L, Lasen M, Field E, Skamp K. Promoting Online Students’ Engagement and Learning in Science and Sustainability Preservice Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2015;40(40):78–107. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.5
39. Sawang S, Newton C, Jamieson K. Increasing learners’ satisfaction/intention to adopt more e‐learning. Education + Training. 2013;55(1):83–105. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00400911311295031
40. Sloan D, Porter E, Robins K, McCourt K. Using e-learning to support international students’ dissertation preparation. Education + Training. 2014;56(2/3):122–140. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/et-10-2012-0103
41. Lambropoulos N, Faulkner X, Culwin F. Supporting social awareness in collaborative e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2012;43(2):295–306. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01184.x
42. Jordan K. Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2014;15(1):133–160.
43. Brophy J. Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist. 2008;43:132–141.
44. Adams AEM, Randall S, Traustadóttir T. A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2015;14(1). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0118
45. Gilbert NJ, Driscoll MP. Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2002;50(1):59–79. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02504961
46. Nortvig AM, Petersen AK, Hattesen S. A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electron. J. E Learn. 2018;16:46–55.
47. Ryan S, Kaufman J, Greenhouse J, She R, Shi J. The effectiveness of blended online learning courses at the community college level. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 2016;40(4):285–298. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2015.1044584
48. Heinerichs S, Pazzaglia G, Gilboy MB. Using flipped classroom components in blended courses to maximize student learning. Athletic Training Education Journal. 2016;11:54–57. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4085/110154
49. Castle SR, McGuire C. An Analysis of Student Self-Assessment of Online, Blended, and Face-to-Face Learning Environments: Implications for Sustainable Education Delivery. International Education Studies. 2010;3(3):36–40. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n3p36
50. Gray JA, Diloreto M. The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. 2016;11(1).
51. Oncu S, Cakir H. Research in online learning environments: Priorities and methodologies. Computers & Education. 2011;57(1):1098–1108. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.009
52. Vonderwell S, Liang X, Alderman K. Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2007;39(3):309–328. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782485
53. Kim N, Smith MJ, Maeng K. Assessment in online distance education: A comparison of three online programs at a university. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 2008;11(1).
54. Kennedy K, Nowak S, Raghuraman R, Thomas J, Davis SF. Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views. College Student Journal. 2000;34(2):309–314.
55. Baran E, Correia AP, Thompson A. Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education. 2011;32(3):421–439. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293
56. Moore R. Importance of developing community in distance education courses. TechTrends. 2014;58(2):20–25.
57. Coppola NW, Hiltz SR, Rotter NG. Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2002;18(4):169–189. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045703
58. Hunt AM. Blended Online Learning in Initial Teacher Education: A Professional Inquiry into Pre-service Teachers’ Inquiry Projects. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning. 2015;19(2):48–60.
59. Scagnoli NI, Buki LP, Johnson SD. The influence of online teaching on face- to-face teaching practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2009;13:115–128.
60. Stone MT, Perumean-Chaney S. The benefits of online teaching for traditional classroom pedagogy: A case study for improving face-to-face instruction. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2011;7:393–400.
61. Chen PSD, Lambert AD, Guidry KR. Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education. 2010;54(4):1222–1232. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
62. Ferguson JM, DeFelice AE. Length of online course and student satisfaction, perceived learning, and academic performance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2010;11:73. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i2.772
63. Huang X, Hsiao E. Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an on- line environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 2012;13(1):15–30.
64. Ward ME, Peters G, Shelley K. Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2010;11. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.867
65. Bristow D, Shepherd CD, Humphreys M, Ziebell M. To Be Or Not To Be: That Isn't the Question! An Empiric al Look at Online Versus Traditional Brick-and-Mortar Courses at the University Level. Marketing Education Review. 2011;21(3):241–250. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2753/mer1052-8008210304
66. Gallagher-Lepak S, Reilly J, Killion CM. Nursing student perceptions of community in online learning. Contemporary Nurse. 2009;32(1-2):133–146. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5172/conu.32.1-2.133
67. Ferriera A, Santoso A. Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance. Accounting & Finance. 2008;48(2):209–231.
68. Northey G, Bucic T, Chylinski M, Govind R. Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning. Journal of Marketing Education. 2015;37(3):171–180. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475315589814
69. Joksimović S, Gašević D, Kovanović V, Riecke BE, Hatala M. Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2015;31(6):638–654. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107
70. Barber W, King S, Buchanan S. Problem Based Learning and Authentic Assessment in Digital Pedagogy: Embracing the Role of Collaborative Communities. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning. 2015;13(2):59–64.
71. Fletcher T, Bullock SM. Reframing pedagogy while teaching about teaching online: a collaborative self-study. Professional Development in Education. 2015;41(4):690–706. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.938357
72. Pellas N, kazanidis I. Engaging students in blended and online collaborative courses at university level through Second Life: comparative perspectives and instructional affordances. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 2014;20:123–144. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2013.856958
73. Katzer C, Fetchenhauer D, Belschak F. Cyberbullying: Who are the victims?: A comparison of victimization in Internet chatrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications. 2009;21:25.
74. Li L, Gao F. The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2016;41(6):885–900.
75. Cheng G, JC. Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2016;47(2):257–278.
76. Montrieux H, Vangestel S, Raes A, Matthys P, Schellens T. Blending face-to-face higher education with web-based lectures: Comparing different didactical application scenarios. Educational Technology and Society. 2015;18(1):170–182.
77. Lancellotti M, Thomas S, Kohli C. Online video modules for improvement in student learning. Journal of Education for Business. 2016;91(1):19–22. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1108281
78. Chiero R, Beare P, Marshall J, Torgerson C. Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning in teacher preparation. Educational Media International. 2015;52(3):188–200. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1075101
79. Wallace RM. Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information. 2003;3:241–280. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310303143
80. Price L, Kirkwood A. Informed design of educational technology for teaching and learning? Towards an evidence-informed model of good practice. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 2014;23(3):325–347. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2014.942749
81. Schoenacher SR. Building Social Capital through Online Class Discussions: A Little Freedom Goes a Long Way. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2009;37(3):291–304. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2190/et.37.3.e
82. Zhao H, Sullivan KPH, Mellenius I. Participation, interaction and social presence: An exploratory study of collaboration in online peer review groups. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2014;45(5):807–819. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12094
83. Southard S, Meddaugh J, AFH. Can SPOC (self-paced online course) live long and prosper? A comparison study of a new species of online course delivery. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 2015;18(2).
84. Chametzky B. Offsetting the affective filter: A classic grounded theory study of post-secondary online foreign language learners . Northcentral University thesis
85. Dhawan S, Shochat T. Functional consequences of inadequate sleep in adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2013.
86. Liaw S. Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education. 2008;51(2):864–873.
87. Vu P, Cao V, Cepero J. Factors driving learner success in online professional development. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2014;15(3):120–139.
88. Bulck JVd. Television Viewing, Computer Game Playing, and Internet Use and Self-Reported Time to Bed and Time out of Bed in Secondary-School Children. Sleep. 2004;27(1):101–104. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/27.1.101
89. Li S, Zhu S, Yan JX, Wu C, Jiang S, F. Risk factors associated with short sleep duration among Chinese school-aged children. Sleep medicine. 2010;11(9):907–923.
90. Lowenthal, Thomas D. Death to the digital Dropbox: Rethinking student privacy and public performance. EDUCAUSE Quarterly. 2010;(3) 33.
91. Leger D, Metlaine A, Choudat D. Insomnia and Sleep Disruption: Relevance for Athletic Performance. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2005;24(2):269–285. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2004.12.011
92. Warschauer M. Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide. First Monday. 2002;7(7). Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i7.967
93. Lowenthal, Thomas D. Digital campfires: Innovations in helping faculty explore the online learning wildness. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2010;6:665–672.
94. Price L, Kirkwood A. Using technology for teaching and learning in higher education: a critical review of the role of evidence in informing practice. Higher Education Research & Development. 2014;33(3):549–564. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841643
95. Harsha R, Bai T. Covid -19 Lockdown-Challenges to Higher Education. Cape Comorin. Special Issue. 2020;2(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16290.25281