• P-ISSN 0974-6846 E-ISSN 0974-5645

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Article

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Year: 2020, Volume: 13, Issue: 26, Pages: 2625-2632

Original Article

Role of leadership communication in creating change readiness: revisiting Kurt Lewin's Model in telecommunication sector of Pakistan

Received Date:17 June 2020, Accepted Date:08 July 2020, Published Date:27 July 2020

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of present study is to investigate the relationship between Change Communication and employees' readiness for change. Additionally, the study has attempted to address the mediating effect of employees trust on Change communication – employees' readiness relationship. Furthermore,the study reports the moderating effect of employees' openness on relationship between Change communication and employees trust. Method: Data collected from employees of telecommunication sector in Pakistan i.e PTCL, Ufone, Mobilink, Telenor undergoing through structural change. A two-step method to partial least square- structural equation modeling used in the study. Findings: Testing the Kurt Lewin theory of change providing empirical evidence on the hypothesized relationships found that communication was positively associated with employee readiness. However, employee trust mediates this link. The relationship between communication and trust depends on higher levels of employee openness to change. Novelty: This study will be among few studies that have highlighted the importance of change communication in developing trust by removing fears and uncertainties and making employees ready to accept the change during mergers, acquisitions and divestitures using the lens of Lewin's three-step model.

Keywords: Change communication; openness to change; trust in leadership; readiness for change

References

  1. Cinite I, Duxbury LE. Measuring the Behavioral Properties of Commitment and Resistance to Organizational Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2018;54(2):113–139. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886318757997
  2. Christensen M. Communication as a Strategic Tool in Change Processes. International Journal of Business Communication. 2014;51(4):359–85.
  3. Knowles ES, Linn JA. The Importance of Resistance to Persuasion. In: Resistance and persuasion. (pp. 3-9) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 2004.
  4. Kanwal A, Ahmad N, Majid M, Nadeem M. The Efficiency of Merger and Acquisition in Telcom Sector of Pakistan. Singaporean Journal of Business, Economics and Management Studies. 1122;51:1–12.
  5. Akca M, Strategic, Leadership. Readiness for Change, and Innovative Work Behavior. Strategy and Superior Performance of Micro and Small Businesses in Volatile Economies. Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science2019. ;p. 57–77.
  6. Hussain ST, Lei S, Akram T, Haider MJ, Hussain SH, Ali M. Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2018;3(3):123–127. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002
  7. PORTOGHESE I, GALLETTA M, BATTISTELLI A, SAIANI L, PENNA MP, ALLEGRINI E. Change-related expectations and commitment to change of nurses: the role of leadership and communication. Journal of Nursing Management. 2012;20(5):582–591. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01322.x
  8. Gilley A, Gilley JW, McMillan HS. Organizational change: Motivation, communication, and leadership effectiveness. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2009;21:75–94. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/piq.20039
  9. Ocasio W, Loewenstein J, Nigam A. How Streams of Communication Reproduce and Change Institutional Logics: The Role of Categories. Academy of Management Review. 2015;40(1):28–48. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0274
  10. Dietz G, Hartog DND. Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review. 2006;35(5):557–588. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483480610682299
  11. Simoes PMM, Esposito M. Improving change management: how communication nature influences resistance to change. Journal of Management Development. 2014;33(4):324–341. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jmd-05-2012-0058
  12. Arnaout B, Esposito M. The value of communication in turbulent environments: how SMEs manage change successfully in unstable surroundings. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. 2018;34(4):500–515.
  13. Bordia P, Hunt E, Paulsen N, Tourish D, DiFonzo N. Uncertainty during organizational change: Is it all about control? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2004;13(3):345–365. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000128
  14. Rafferty AE, Jimmieson NL, Restubog S, Oreg S, Michel A, By RT, et al. When leadership meets organizational change: The influence of the top management team and supervisory leaders on change appraisals, change attitudes, and adjustment to change. In: Oreg S, Micheal A, By RT., eds. The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee's perspective. (pp. 145-172) Cambridge University Press..
  15. Fugate M, Oreg S, Michel A, By RT.
  16. Armenakis AA, Harris SG, Mossholder KW. Creating Readiness for Organizational Change. Human Relations. 1993;46(6):681–703. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600601
  17. Reinke SJ. Does the Form Really Matter? SAGE Publications. 2003. doi: 10.1177/0734371x02250109
  18. Stahl GK, Sitkin SB. 2005.
  19. Armenakis AA, Harris SG. Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2002;15(2):169–183. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09534810210423080
  20. Stevens GW. Toward a Process-Based Approach of Conceptualizing Change Readiness. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2013;49(3):333–360. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886313475479
  21. Oreg S, Vakola M, Armenakis A. Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2011;47(4):461–524. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886310396550
  22. Erwin DG, Garman AN. Resistance to organizational change: linking research and practice. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2010;31(1):39–56. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437731011010371
  23. Blau PM. Exchange and power in social life. New York. John Wiley and Sons. 1964.
  24. Bouckenooghe D, Devos G, Broeck HVd. Organizational Change Questionnaire–Climate of Change, Processes, and Readiness: Development of a New Instrument. The Journal of Psychology. 2009;143(6):559–599. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980903218216
  25. Susskind AM, Miller VD, Johnson JD. Downsizing and structural holes: Their impact on layoff survivors' perceptions of organizational chaos and openness to change. Communication Research. 1998;25(1):30–65.
  26. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2). 2017.
  27. Dijkstra TK, Henseler J. Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2015;81:10–23. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2014.07.008
  28. Wong KK. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using. SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin. 2013;24(1):1–32.
  29. Henseler J, Fassott G, Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H. Handbook of partial least squares. Handbook of partial least squares2010. 2010.
  30. Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research. 1998;8(2):295–336.
  31. Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Henseler J, Hair JF. On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon. Long range planning. 2012;47(3):154–60.
  32. Langer R, Thorup S. Building trust in times of crisis: Storytelling and change communication in an airline company. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 2006;11(4):371–90.
  33. Zayim M, Kondakci Y. An exploration of the relationship between readiness for change and organizational trust in Turkish public schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2015;43(4):610–625. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143214523009
  34. Wanberg CR, Banas JT. Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000;85(1):132–142. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.132

Copyright

© 2020 Memon, Shah,Khoso.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee)

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.