Seismotectonics of Andaman-Sumatra Region: Seismic Quiescence and B Value as Possible Precursors

A P Anjana; S Lasitha

doi:10.17485/IJST/v16i8.2310

Article

Seismotectonics of Andaman-Sumatra Region: Seismic Quiescence and B Value as Possible Precursors

VIEWS 687
PDF 115

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

DOI: 10.17485/IJST/v16i8.2310

Year: 2023, Volume: 16, Issue: 8, Pages: 557-569

Original Article

Seismotectonics of Andaman-Sumatra Region: Seismic Quiescence and B Value as Possible Precursors

A P Anjana¹, S Lasitha^1*

¹Department of Earth Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605014, India

*Corresponding Author
Email: [email protected]

Received Date:15 December 2022, Accepted Date:25 January 2023, Published Date:27 February 2023

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Objectives: a) To analyze the long-term seismicity and understand the potential of seismic quiescence study to use it as a reliable seismic precursor b) To estimate B value and understand the variation in B value as earthquake precursor in seismically active region. Methods: The present study analyses the seismicity pattern from the Andaman- Sumatra region for a period of 1964 to 2018. The area has been divided into epicentral blocks. Earthquakes preceding and succeeding a major earthquake with different seismic phases of quiescence and pattern of seismicity have been studied carefully. All quiescence periods are characterized by high b values and period of major shocks has a low b value. Main shock events for each epicentral block with different phases of quiescence (Q1, Q2 and Q3) and active seismicity have been identified and analyzed. Findings: The study suggests that there is generally approximately 6-12 years of gap between major earthquakes. There are 28 years of quiescence before the major earthquake of the stature of Dec 26, 2004 mega earthquake, suggesting that long term quiescence leads to great earthquakes. The study also proposes that the area between 20 and 60N latitudes shows a long-term quiescence which may lead to a major earthquake in the near future. A thorough analysis of long-term seismicity and seismic quiescence can be used as an earthquake precursor, though with limitations. The latest post seismic quiescence period Q2 after the greater events of 2004 and 2005, may yield an impending event of 6.5 M or even greater. Novelty: The present study deals with the precursor studies of one of the most important tectonic zone. Extensive analysis of 54 Years of data has been done and the scope of using seismicity and b value for the long-term prediction of earthquakes has been examined. The periodicity of seismicity has been used to quantify the precursors. Though various statistical studies have been attempted for this zone, methodology adopted here proved one of the reliable methods to check for the possible mega earthquakes of this seismically active zone, which can be applied to other seismically active areas as well.

Keywords: Seismicity; Andaman-Sumatra; Seismic quiescence; B-value; Precursors

References

Shamim SK, Khan PK, Mohanty SP, Mohanty MP. Andaman–Nicobar–Sumatra Margin Revisited: Analysis of the Lithospheric Structure and Deformation Based on Gravity Modeling and Distribution of Seismicity. Surveys in Geophysics. 2021;42(2):239–275. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09633-9
Lasitha S. Changes in the moment rate and the long term seismic deformation pattern: Before and after 26 Dec 2004 earthquake. Journal of Indian Geophysical Union. 2015;2(9):192–199. Available from: http://iguonline.in/journal/19-2/6paper.pdf
Mukhopadhyay B, Mukhopadhyay M, Mishra OP, Sengupta D, Dasgupta S, Elawadi E, et al. Constraining the Seismic Potentiality Analysis for Andaman Arc System, NE Indian Ocean. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 2018;91(5):523–534. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-018-0900 -3
Sujit D, Mukhopadhyay B, Mukhopadhyay M. Next Impending Earthquake in Northern Burmese Arc - Search for A Probable Precursor. Memoir Geological Society of India. 2010;(75) 69–80. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/9060453/Next_Impending_Earthquake_in_Northern_Burmese_Arc_Search_for_A_Probable_Precursor
Joseph RC. Tectonics and history of the Andaman Sea region. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2005;2005(25):187–232. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.09.001
Aswini KK, Raju KAK, Dewangan P, Yatheesh VV, Singha P, Reddy TR. Seismotectonic evaluation of off Nicobar earthquake swarms, Andaman Sea. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2021;221(104948). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104948
Katili JA. Volcanism and plate tectonics in the Indonesian island arcs. Tectonophysics. 1975;26(3-4):165–188. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(75)90088-8
Kerry S, Natawidjaja D. Neotectonics of Sumatra fault, Indonesia. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2000;28(105):295–323. Available from: https://authors.library.caltech.edu/21722/1/Sieh2000p28295_Jour_Geophys_Res.pdf
Lasitha S, Radhakrishna M, Sanu T. Seismically active deformation in the Sumatra-Java trench-arc region: geodynamic implications. Current Science. 2006;5(90):690–695. Available from: https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/90/05/0690.pdf
Radhakrishna M, Lasitha S, Mukhopadhyay M. Seismicity, gravity anomalies and lithospheric structure of the Andaman arc, NE Indian Ocean. Tectonophysics. 2008;460(1-4):248–262. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.08.021
Livio C, Piergiorgio P, Sotgiu A. A Critical Review of Ground Based Observations of Earthquake Precursors. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2021;9:1–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.676766
Santawat S, Santi P. Precursory seismic quiescence along the Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone: past and present. J Seismology. 2017;(21) 305–315. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-016-9602-8
Pailoplee S, Panwoon N, Nimnate P. Seismicity rate change along the strike-slip fault system at the Thailand-Myanmar border: Implications for upcoming earthquakes. BEST Journal. 2017;14(1):69–79. Available from: https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bestjournal/article/view/248782
Basab M, Sujit D. Seismic hazard assessment of Kashmir and Kangra valley region, Western Himalaya, India. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. 2015;6(2):149–183. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2013.832405
Sujit D, Basab M. Earthquake Forerunner as Probable Precursor - An Example from North Burma Subduction Zone. J. of Geological society of India. 2012;(80) 393–402. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-012-0157-1
CHS. Mechanisms of Seismic Quiescence. PAGEOPH. 1988;(126) 701–718. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00879016
Gutenberg B, Richter CF. Frequency of earthquakes in California*. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1944;34(4):185–188. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1863453
Kulhanek O. Seminar on b-value. 2005. Available from: http://geo.troja.mff.cuni.cz/magma/magma-051214.pdf
Aki K. Maximum Likelihood Estimate of b in the Formula log10N=a-bm and Its Confidence Limits. Bulletin of Earthquake Research. 1965;(43) 237–239. Available from: https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/33631/files/ji0432001.pdf
Marzocchi W, Sandri L. A technical note on the bias in the estimation of the b-value and its uncertainty through the Least Squares technique. Annals of Geophysics. 2007;50(3):329–339. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4401/ag-4432
Schorlemmer D, Wiemer S, Wyss M. Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes. Nature. 2005;437(7058):539–542. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04094
Hatzidimitriou PM, Papadimitriou EE, Mountrakis DM, Papazachos BC. The seismic parameter b of the frequency-magnitude relation and its association with the geological zones in the area of Greece. Tectonophysics. 1985;(120) 141–151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-19518590092-7 .
Tasapanos T. b-Values of two tectonic parts in the circum-pacific belt. PAGEOPH. 1990;134(2):229–242. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876999
Kanamori H. The Nature of Seismicity Patterns Before Large Earthquakes. In: DWS, PGR., eds. Earthquake Prediction: An International Review Maurice Ewing Series . (Vol. 4, pp. 1-19) American Geophysical Union. 1981.
Katsumata Kei A. Long-Term Seismic Quiescence before the 2004 Sumatra Mw 9.1 Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2015;(105).
Bhatt Gulam Rasool B, Sankaran M, Yousuf. Tectonic geomorphology and seismic hazard of the east boundary thrust in northern segment of the Sunda-Andaman subduction zone. Natural Hazards. 2022.

Copyright

© 2023 Anjana & Lasitha. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee)