Advancing Wireless Sensor Networks through Performance Evaluation of M-PDCH Routing Protocol for Enhanced Quality of Service

Sangeeta Vhatkar; Zahir Aalam; Mohd Atique

doi:10.17485/IJST/v17i9.3265

Article

Advancing Wireless Sensor Networks through Performance Evaluation of M-PDCH Routing Protocol for Enhanced Quality of Service

VIEWS 209
PDF 62

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

DOI: 10.17485/IJST/v17i9.3265

Year: 2024, Volume: 17, Issue: 9, Pages: 794-803

Original Article

Advancing Wireless Sensor Networks through Performance Evaluation of M-PDCH Routing Protocol for Enhanced Quality of Service

Sangeeta Vhatkar^1*, Zahir Aalam², Mohd Atique³

¹Department of Information Technology, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
²Department of Computer Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
³Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India

*Corresponding Author
Email: [email protected]

Received Date:29 December 2023, Accepted Date:29 January 2024, Published Date:20 February 2024

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Objective: The decisive aim of this investigation is to improve the capabilities and limitations of PEGASIS with Double Cluster Head (PDCH), for enhancing the overall Quality of Service (QoS) in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Methods: This research is intended at the application of efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. It works on the principle of the formation of cluster head and clustering. This is accomplished to achieve high QoS for WSN. Improving the efficacy of a WSN protocol is decisive for optimizing communication, resource utilization, and overall effectiveness. An innovative and novel protocol named Mobile-PDCH (M-PDCH) has been devised, developed, and tested. Here several parameters have been carefully investigated for enhancing the performance of a WSN protocol such as energy consumption, delay, and packet loss. A simulation environment has been created to evaluate, compare, and validate the performance and to suggest the desired applications of the proposed protocol. Findings: In the hierarchical category, PDCH performs better compared to all the other protocols. But it suffers from high packet drop, which decrease the performance of the protocol. To improve the performance of sensor networks, there is a need for adaptive routing protocol. The examination of simulation outcomes for the recommended protocol, M-PDCH, has been conducted in comparison with PDCH. The findings indicate that the protocol exhibits superior performance. The proposed algorithm improves the packet drop by 29.75%, reduces delay by 23.28%, and lowers energy consumption by 19.18% when compared to PDCH. Novelty: A novel adaptive routing protocol termed M-PDCH has been proposed for the enhancement of the WSN life span and durability of the sensor nodes. The simulation results show that the proposed algorithm produces better results compared to PDCH protocol. The various QoS parameter results are compared, verified, and validated with existing protocol PDCH.

Keywords: WSN, PDCH, Design issues, Metrics, QoS, HRP

References

Khan MA, Hussain S. Energy Efficient Direction-Based Topology Control Algorithm for WSN. Wireless Sensor Network. 2020;12(03):37–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/wsn.2020.123003
Gulati K, Boddu RSK, Kapila D, Bangare SL, Chandnani N, Saravanan G. A review paper on wireless sensor network techniques in Internet of Things (IoT) Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;51(Part 1):161–165. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.067
Rawat P, Chauhan S. Clustering protocols in wireless sensor network: A survey, classification, issues, and future directions. Computer Science Review. 2021;40:100396. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100396
Khan MK, Shiraz M, Shaheen Q, Butt SA, Akhtar R, Khan MA, et al. Hierarchical Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks: Functional and Performance Analysis. Journal of Sensors. 2021;2021:1–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7459368
Vhatkar S, Atique M. Design Issues and Challenges in Hierarchical Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: 2014 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence. (pp. 90-95) IEEE. 2014.
Vhatkar S, Nanade A, Atique M. Performance evaluation and QoS analysis of PDCH and MBC routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. In: 2017 Fourteenth International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks (WOCN). (Vol. 2017, pp. 1-5) IEEE. 2017.
Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H. Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE. 2000.
Chan L, Chavez KG, Rudolph H, Hourani A. Hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor network: a compressive survey. Wireless Networks. 2020;26(5):3291–3314. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02260-z
Zeb A, Islam AKMM, Zareei M, Mamoon IA, Mansoor N, Baharun S, et al. Clustering Analysis in Wireless Sensor Networks: The Ambit of Performance Metrics and Schemes Taxonomy. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2016;12(7):1–24. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/155014774979142
Rana H, Vhatkar S, Atique M. Comparative Study of PEGASIS Protocols in Wireless Sensor Network. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering. 2014;16(5):25–30. Available from: https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jce/papers/Vol16-issue5/Version-1/E016512530.pdf
Joshi P, Singh G, Raghuvanshi AS. Impact of Duty Cycle and Different Routing Protocols on the Energy Consumption of a Wireless Sensor Network. In: 2020 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP). IEEE. 2020.
Liu W, Harn L, Weng J. Lightweight key establishment with the assistance of mutually connected sensors in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) IET Communications. 2022;16(1):58–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1049/cmu2.12312
Vhatkar S, Mehta S, Atique M. Performance Evaluation and QoS Analysis of BCDCP and CBCB Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. Communications on Applied Electronics. 2015;3(4):53–58. Available from: https://www.caeaccess.org/research/volume3/number4/vhatkar-2015-cae-651948.pdf
Rana J, Vhatkar S, Atique M. Comparative Study Of PEGASIS And PDCH Protocols In Wireless Sensor Network. In: International Conference and Workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology. (pp. 13-18) IOSR Journals. 2015.
Vhatkar S, Rana J, Atique M. Performance Evaluation and QoS Analysis of EEPB and PDCH Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering. 2015;17(5):101–109. Available from: https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jce/papers/Vol17-issue5/Version-4/O01754101109.pdf
Nanade A, Vhatkar S, Atique M. Comparative study of MBC and hierarchical routing protocol. In: International Conference & Workshop on Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering (ICWET 2016). IEEE. 2017.

Copyright

© 2024 Vhatkar et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee)