Indian Journal of Science and Technology
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2020/v13i07/149850
Year: 2020, Volume: 13, Issue: 7, Pages: 817 – 831
Original Article
Gemma V. Espí-López1,#,*, Lucas Monzani2,#, Rosario Zurriaga3,#, Pierre-Michel Dugailly4, M. Teófila Vicente-Herrero5, Lars L. Andersen6
1Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Gascó Oliag Street, 5, 46010 Valencia, Spain
2Ivey Business School, Western University, Canada
3University Research Institute of Human Resources Psychology, Organizational Development and Quality of Work Life (IDOCAL), University of Valencia, Spain
4Research Unit in Osteopathy, Faculty of Motor Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
5Occupational Health Service, Correos Group of Valencia, Spain
6National Research Centre for the Working Environment, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
#The authors have contributed equally
*Author for correspondence:
Gemma V. Espí-López
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Gascó Oliag Street, 5, 46010 Valencia, Spain
E-mail ID: gemma.espi@uv.es
Background: Assessing patient’s cognitions and emotions about their physical body is an important part of rehabilitation planning, as musculoskeletal disorders can lead to a change in bodily perceptions.
Methods: This study explores the validity and reliability of the Body Satisfaction and Global Self-Perception Questionnaire (QSCPGS)] in the Spanish population. In addition to calculating Cronbach’s alpha, we conducted Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analyses to test the scale’s validity. We then conducted a test–retest and longitudinal measurement invariance test to explore our measure’s reliability.
Results: Our final sample consisted of 147 subjects with non-specific musculoskeletal disorders (M = 32 years, SD = 15.06), who provided two data points in a 30-day period. A reduced, four-factor model fit the data better [(χ2 = 92.51*; df = 71; df = χ2/df = 1.30; RMSEA= .04; CFI = .95; TLI = .94; SRMR = .05; WRMR = .84)] than any other model. The re-test validity analyses revealed that the four-factor model was stable over time. Finally, the reduced scale correlated with the SF-36 Quality of Life inventory and participants’ BMI.
Conclusions: The QSCPGSe (Spanish version QSCPGS) is a reliable and effective tool for measuring body image perceptions that are more accurate than the original scale.
Keywords: Body Satisfaction, Questionnaire, Global Self Perception, Musculoskeletal.
Subscribe now for latest articles and news.