• P-ISSN 0974-6846 E-ISSN 0974-5645

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Article

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Year: 2024, Volume: 17, Issue: 2, Pages: 194-203

Original Article

Isolation and Characterization of Antagonistic Bacteria from the Gut of Lampito mauritii (Kinberg, 1866)

Received Date:09 November 2023, Accepted Date:16 December 2023, Published Date:12 January 2024

Abstract

Objective: To isolate and characterize potentially antagonistic bacteria from the gut of Lampito mauritii earthworms. Methods: Lampito mauritii earthworms were collected and gut bacteria were isolated on nutrient agar. Antibacterial activity of isolates was checked by well diffusion against fish and human pathogens. Potent isolates were characterized biochemically. Antimicrobial metabolites were extracted from Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate TR07 using ethyl acetate and tested by disc diffusion. TR07 was identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Antibacterial efficacy was assessed statistically. Results: Among 38 discrete isolates, 4 exhibited antibacterial activity against Aeromonas hydrophila and Staphylococcus aureus in well-diffusion assay. These 4 isolates were characterized as Pseudomonas sp., Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp., and Bacillus sp. based on biochemical tests. Antimicrobial metabolites extracted from Pseudomonas sp. TR07 using ethyl acetate showed statistically significant inhibition against gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial fish and human pathogens in disc diffusion assay. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing and phylogenetic analysis identified the potent isolate TR07 as Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 99.62% sequence homology. Novelty: In a fortuitous finding, the antibacterial potency of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was dramatically amplified through the utilization of a strikingly minute concentration of the bacterial culture extract.

Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Earthworm gut, Antibacterial metabolites, Human pathogens, Fish pathogens

References

  1. Blouin M, Hodson ME, Delgado EA, Baker G, Brussaard L, Butt KR, et al. A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science. 2013;64(2):161–182. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12025
  2. Kumar R, Yadav R, Gupta RK, Yodha K, Kataria SK, Kadyan P, et al. The Earthworms: Charles Darwin’s Ecosystem Engineer. In: Hakeem KR, Grichar WJ., eds. Organic Fertilizers - New Advances and Applications, Agricultural Sciences. IntechOpen. 2023.
  3. Wüst PK, Horn MA, Drake HL. Clostridiaceae and Enterobacteriaceae as active fermenters in earthworm gut content. The ISME Journal. 2011;5(1):92–106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.99
  4. Hu L, Robert CAM, Cadot S, Zhang XI, Ye M, Li B, et al. Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05122-7
  5. Thakur SS, Lone AR, Tiwari N, Jain SK, Yadav S. Metagenomic Exploration of Bacterial Community Structure of Earthworms’ Gut. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 2021;15(3):1156–1172. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam15305
  6. Walke JB, Becker MH, Loftus SC, House LL, Cormier G, Jensen RV, et al. Amphibian skin may select for rare environmental microbes. The ISME Journal. 2014;8(11):2207–2217. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.77
  7. Subasinghe RP, Bondad-Reantaso MG, McGladdery SE. Aquaculture development, health and wealth. 2001. Available from: https://library.enaca.org/General/pag167-197.htm
  8. Bondad-Reantaso MG, Subasinghe RP, Arthur JR, Ogawa K, Chinabut S, Adlard R, et al. Disease and health management in Asian aquaculture. Veterinary Parasitology. 2005;132(3-4):249–272. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.07.005
  9. Blakemore RJ. Japanese earthworms (Annelida: Oligochaeta): a review and checklist of species. Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 2003;3(3):241–244. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-6092-00082
  10. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (2). (pp. 1-426) Cold spring harbor laboratory press. 1989.
  11. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk Method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1966;45(4):493–496. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5325707/
  12. Alonso S, Castro MC, Berdasco M, Banda IGdl, Moreno-Ventas XG, Rojas AHd. Isolation and Partial Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria from the Gut Microbiota of Marine Fishes for Potential Application as Probiotics in Aquaculture. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2019;11(2):569–579. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9439-2
  13. Midhun SJ, Neethu S, Vysakh A, Sunil MA, Radhakrishnan EK, Jyothis M. Antibacterial activity of autochthonous bacteria isolated from Anabas testudineus (Bloch, 1792) and it's in vitro probiotic characterization. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017;113:312–320. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.10.058
  14. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology. 1991;173(2):697–703. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991
  15. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2018;35(6):1547–1549. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  16. Breidenstein EBM, Fuente-Núñez Cdl, Hancock REW. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: all roads lead to resistance. Trends in Microbiology. 2011;19(8):419–426. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.04.005
  17. Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BHA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2017;7:1–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039
  18. Amankwah FKD, Gbedema SY, Boakye YD, Bayor MT, Boamah VE. Antimicrobial Potential of Extract from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolate. Scientifica. 2022;2022:1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4230397
  19. Sruthy PB, Anjana JC, Rathinamala J, Jayashree S. The role of red pigment prodigiosin from bacteria of earthworm gut as an anticancer agent. Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Food Sciences. 2014;4(3):246–251. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2014-15.4.3.246-251
  20. Parthasarathi K, Ranganathan LS, Anandi V, Zeyer J. Diversity of microflora in the gut and casts of tropical composting earthworms reared on different substrates. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2007;28(1):87–97. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17717992/
  21. Hussain M, Liaqat I, Hanif U, Sultan A, Ara C, Aftab N, et al. Medicinal Perspective of Antibacterial Bioactive Agents in Earthworms (Clitellata, Annelida): A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Oleo Science. 2022;71(4):563–573. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess21379
  22. Citarasu T. Natural antimicrobial compounds for use in aquaculture. Infectious Disease in Aquaculture. 2012;p. 419–456. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857095732.3.419

Copyright

© 2024 Balagangatharan et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Published By Indian Society for Education and Environment (iSee)

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.